Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla

Radiation Oncology Jackson, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1124584800 CMS profile 6204351

Department Of Radiation Oncology, 350 Woodrow Wilson Dr, Jackson, MS 39216

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,085

105 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla of Jackson, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,085 across 105 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 81st percentile of Radiation Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $346 15
2024 General $1,273 51
2023 General $638 26
2022 General $556 9
2021 General $271 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla
  • Radiation Oncology median
  • Middle half of Radiation Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla were reported at $346. Among 3,409 Radiation Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $172 and the middle half received between $61 and $514.

Show as a table
Year Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla Radiation Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $138 $48–$462 $163
2020 $0 $79 $26–$262 $114
2021 $271 $119 $37–$358 $132
2022 $556 $139 $43–$424 $149
2023 $638 $167 $57–$473 $160
2024 $1,273 $168 $56–$541 $164
2025 $346 $172 $61–$514 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $664 32 payments
  2. Novocure Inc. $635 17 payments
  3. GT Medical Technologies, Inc $627 12 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $304 7 payments
  5. Boston Scientific Corporation $149 2 payments
  6. Incyte Corporation $137 7 payments
  7. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $119 5 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $81 4 payments
  9. CutisPharma, Inc. $75 5 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $52 3 payments
  11. Other $241 11 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,986 104 payments
  2. Education $99 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $664 32 payments
  2. GammaTile $540 9 payments
  3. Optune Oncology $229 7 payments
  4. LYNPARZA $223 12 payments
  5. Optune Oncology $211 5 payments
  6. IMFINZI $142 3 payments
  7. WELIREG $129 7 payments
  8. GENERAL - ONCOLOGY $123 1 payment
  9. ENHERTU $119 5 payments
  10. NovoTTF-100L $119 2 payments
  11. Other $1,066 52 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

105 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record