Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Taylor Strowman

Infectious Disease Charleston, SC Physician Assistant

NPI 1780242834 CMS profile 11172289

171 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC 29425

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,150

210 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Taylor Strowman of Charleston, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,150 across 210 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Infectious Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $44 3
2024 General $1,134 47
2023 General $1,217 55
2022 General $1,793 56
2021 General $961 49

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Taylor Strowman
  • Infectious Disease median
  • Middle half of Infectious Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Taylor Strowman were reported at $44. Among 3,905 Infectious Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $188 and the middle half received between $57 and $766.

Show as a table
Year Taylor Strowman Infectious Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $190 $60–$862 $163
2020 $0 $124 $32–$606 $114
2021 $961 $148 $38–$905 $132
2022 $1,793 $166 $50–$834 $149
2023 $1,217 $171 $57–$787 $160
2024 $1,134 $176 $52–$752 $164
2025 $44 $188 $57–$766 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $1,545 38 payments
  2. ViiV Healthcare Company $755 38 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $513 20 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $364 21 payments
  5. La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company $284 13 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $271 16 payments
  7. Astellas Pharma US Inc $220 9 payments
  8. Shionogi Inc $191 7 payments
  9. Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. $171 6 payments
  10. Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $140 7 payments
  11. Other $696 35 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,574 208 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $560 1 payment
  3. Education $16 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. APRETUDE $292 13 payments
  2. XERAVA $284 13 payments
  3. PIFELTRO $278 11 payments
  4. SYMTUZA $271 16 payments
  5. DIFICID $268 11 payments
  6. DOVATO $247 16 payments
  7. Fetroja $191 7 payments
  8. Kimyrsa $171 6 payments
  9. CABENUVA $169 7 payments
  10. Cresemba $167 7 payments
  11. Other $2,447 117 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 3 drugs

Part D claims

75

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$254,589

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

84%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 51 $206,576
Genvoya Elviteg/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alafen Brand 12 $46,819
Darunavir Generic 12 $1,194

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
NUZYRA
  • Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $140
$140 — —
DOVATO
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $111
$111 — —
REBYOTA
  • Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. $64
$64 — —
XERAVA
  • La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company $59
$59 — —
PIFELTRO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $46
$46 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

210 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record