Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tauseef Ahmed

Hematology & Oncology Bronx, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1093778458 CMS profile 140937

1775 Grand Concourse Fl 1, Ste 2100, Bronx, NY 10453

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$171,442

167 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tauseef Ahmed of Bronx, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $171,442 across 167 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $185 2
2024 General $13,849 14
2023 General $32,585 29
2022 General $36,234 29
2021 General $18,235 18
2020 General $3,642 8
2019 General $66,712 67

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tauseef Ahmed
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tauseef Ahmed were reported at $185. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Tauseef Ahmed Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $66,712 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $3,642 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $18,235 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $36,234 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $32,585 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $13,849 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $185 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BeiGene USA, Inc. $48,543 46 payments
  2. Celgene Corporation $43,963 35 payments
  3. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $26,312 16 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $23,796 21 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $21,031 12 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,017 5 payments
  7. Kite Pharma, Inc. $1,819 2 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,392 6 payments
  9. Epizyme, Inc., $1,262 2 payments
  10. Medtronic, Inc. $185 2 payments
  11. Other $1,123 20 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $128,206 42 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $25,434 33 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $10,154 5 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $5,286 74 payments
  5. Honoraria $1,250 1 payment
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $565 1 payment
  7. Education $549 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BRUKINSA $47,718 45 payments
  2. Revlimid $39,548 30 payments
  3. NINLARO $26,125 14 payments
  4. Pomalyst $24,330 20 payments
  5. SARCLISA $20,913 11 payments
  6. KYMRIAH $1,965 1 payment
  7. Tecartus $1,700 1 payment
  8. IMBRUVICA $1,392 6 payments
  9. TAZVERIK $1,262 2 payments
  10. MONOFERRIC $169 1 payment
  11. Other $1,572 35 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

407

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$4,216,508

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

69.8%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 47 $1,096,896
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 53 $931,708
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 36 $789,444
Erleada Apalutamide Brand 15 $380,250
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 22 $368,717
Ninlaro Ixazomib Citrate Brand 28 $345,980
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 11 $159,244
Sandostatin Lar Depot Octreotide Acetate,mi-Spheres Brand 13 $57,639
Zarxio Filgrastim-Sndz Brand 13 $35,289
Retacrit Epoetin Alfa-Epbx Brand 13 $29,184

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 8 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$29,121

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

149

Average age 75

Services billed

305

85 women, 64 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 46%
Arthritis 42%
Cancer 38%
Diabetes 31%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Osteoporosis 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BRUKINSA
  • BeiGene USA, Inc. $13,680
$13,680 — —
MONOFERRIC
  • Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc. $169
$169 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

167 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record