Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tasha Boone

Family Medicine Irmo, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1699745141 CMS profile 303359

7430 College St, Irmo, SC 29063

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,750

768 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$2,411

Paid to them · 5 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,868,143 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Tasha Boone of Irmo, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,750 across 768 general payments and $2,411 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,868,143 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,694 85
2024 General $1,269 80
2023 General $1,399 84
2022 General $1,644 95
2021 General $2,314 144
2020 General $2,502 157
2020 Research $1,153 3
2019 General $1,927 123
2019 Research $1,258 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tasha Boone
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tasha Boone were reported at $1,694. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Tasha Boone Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,927 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $2,502 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,314 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,644 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,399 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,269 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,694 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,330 67 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,115 107 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,077 59 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,015 50 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $979 62 payments
  6. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $643 31 payments
  7. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $643 36 payments
  8. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $635 46 payments
  9. Forte Bio-Pharma LLC $477 7 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $462 26 payments
  11. Other $4,376 277 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,628 766 payments
  2. Long term medical supply or device loan $116 1 payment
  3. Education $7 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XIFAXAN $949 70 payments
  2. FARXIGA $898 46 payments
  3. JARDIANCE Diabetes $677 32 payments
  4. REXULTI $643 31 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $403 24 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $372 22 payments
  7. UBRELVY $348 30 payments
  8. QULIPTA $344 24 payments
  9. RYBELSUS $315 19 payments
  10. Saxenda $303 19 payments
  11. Other $11,864 667 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $2,411 5 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 123 drugs

Part D claims

5,000

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$564,163

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

26.4%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 84 $99,214
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 45 $51,648
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 47 $46,228
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 34 $41,194
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 96 $31,452
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 25 $30,644
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 26 $27,771
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 30 $25,807
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 15 $21,310
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 12 $17,985

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 123 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 52 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$76,005

Of which drugs: $725

Medicare patients

181

Average age 71

Services billed

1,531

142 women, 39 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 13%
Depression 12%
Heart failure 11%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $150
$150 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $111
$111 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $110
$110 12 —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $102
$102 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $96
$96 25 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

773 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record