Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tariq Tanoli

Internal Medicine Chesterfield, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1982860094 CMS profile 44971

224 S Woods Mill Rd, Suite 500 South, Chesterfield, MO 63017

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,263

303 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tariq Tanoli of Chesterfield, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,263 across 303 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,141 49
2024 General $1,128 49
2023 General $1,126 48
2022 General $906 44
2021 General $941 56
2020 General $411 27
2019 General $611 30

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tariq Tanoli
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tariq Tanoli were reported at $1,141. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Tariq Tanoli Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $611 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $411 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $941 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $906 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,126 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,128 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,141 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $585 31 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $388 22 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $379 20 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $366 18 payments
  5. Medtronic, Inc. $305 4 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $300 17 payments
  7. Recordati_Rare_Diseases_Inc. $282 12 payments
  8. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $278 15 payments
  9. Corcept Therapeutics $277 13 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $250 13 payments
  11. Other $2,854 138 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,257 302 payments
  2. Education $6 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $530 28 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $502 27 payments
  3. DUPIXENT $295 13 payments
  4. Korlym $277 13 payments
  5. ISTURISA $266 11 payments
  6. MINIMED 780G $238 2 payments
  7. TALTZ $174 9 payments
  8. SIGNIFOR LAR $156 7 payments
  9. TREMFYA $147 7 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $142 8 payments
  11. Other $5,297 272 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 81 drugs

Part D claims

6,356

Median for Endocrinology: 1,959

Drug cost

$2,580,662

Median for Endocrinology: $890,201

Branded share of claims

54.7%

Median for Endocrinology: 57%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 578 $870,226
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 185 $250,842
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 190 $216,816
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 160 $182,302
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 143 $139,126
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 134 $136,619
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 142 $134,269
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 80 $131,898
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 62 $61,449
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 61 $58,160

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 81 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 6,527 Part D prescribers listed as Endocrinology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$358,476

Of which drugs: $48,954

Medicare patients

748

Average age 76

Services billed

7,272

388 women, 360 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 74%
Arthritis 56%
Chronic kidney disease 55%
Ischemic heart disease 51%
Heart failure 38%
Atrial fibrillation 36%
Depression 34%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 23 2,220 $45,294
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 21 21 $1,718

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $67
$67 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $67
$67 578 —
STRENSIQ
  • Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $64
$64 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $56
$56 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $55
$55 190 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

303 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record