Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tariq Alam

Neurology Festus, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1144419144 CMS profile 142547

1400 US Highway 61, South, Suite 120, Festus, MO 63028

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,252

593 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tariq Alam of Festus, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,252 across 593 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,297 85
2024 General $1,675 106
2023 General $2,713 138
2022 General $1,321 83
2021 General $6,329 75
2020 General $2,120 53
2019 General $2,797 53

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tariq Alam
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tariq Alam were reported at $1,297. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Tariq Alam Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,797 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $2,120 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $6,329 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $1,321 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $2,713 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $1,675 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $1,297 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $5,161 27 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,885 151 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $2,574 33 payments
  4. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,500 1 payment
  5. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,099 51 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $966 99 payments
  7. Greenwich Biosciences, Inc. $345 18 payments
  8. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $280 30 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $246 12 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $196 10 payments
  11. Other $2,999 161 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,547 583 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $6,700 7 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $1,975 1 payment
  4. Education $30 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $5,441 57 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $2,486 21 payments
  3. UBRELVY Neuroscience $1,925 98 payments
  4. RELISTOR $1,500 1 payment
  5. Epidiolex $1,444 69 payments
  6. QULIPTA $1,269 65 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT Pain $926 94 payments
  8. ZAVZPRET $813 83 payments
  9. ZEPOSIA $167 9 payments
  10. PAXLOVID $148 15 payments
  11. Other $3,610 213 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 95 drugs

Part D claims

9,829

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$2,420,088

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

31.4%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Octagam Immun Globg(Igg)/Malt/Iga Ov50 Brand 76 $542,012
Gammaked Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 17 $244,640
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 162 $203,401
Fingolimod Fingolimod Hcl Brand 42 $179,100
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 129 $133,676
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 102 $116,174
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 120 $113,716
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 15 $112,741
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 12 $91,404
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 61 $84,796

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 95 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$191,133

Of which drugs: $45,044

Medicare patients

903

Average age 72

Services billed

11,584

519 women, 384 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
Depression 46%
Ischemic heart disease 40%
Diabetes 39%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Heart failure 28%
COPD 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 12 9,600 $45,041

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$335 129 —
Epidiolex
$216 22 —
UBRELVY
$190 102 —
NURTEC ODT
$186 162 —
ZAVZPRET
$186 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

593 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record