Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tapan Patel

Retina Specialist Wyomissing, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1174919906 CMS profile 6252532

1 Granite Point Dr Ste 100, Wyomissing, PA 19610

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,141

130 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tapan Patel of Wyomissing, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,141 across 130 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 53rd percentile of Retina Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,035 45
2024 General $833 38
2023 General $903 35
2022 General $331 10
2021 General $37 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tapan Patel
  • Retina Specialist median
  • Middle half of Retina Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tapan Patel were reported at $1,035. Among 1,235 Retina Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $175 and $1,079.

Show as a table
Year Tapan Patel Retina Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $410 $157–$1,517 $163
2020 $0 $168 $65–$778 $114
2021 $37 $258 $101–$1,161 $132
2022 $331 $418 $162–$1,488 $149
2023 $903 $476 $178–$1,312 $160
2024 $833 $520 $188–$1,372 $164
2025 $1,035 $457 $175–$1,079 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $794 35 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $784 31 payments
  3. EyePoint Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $383 7 payments
  4. Genentech USA, Inc. $221 13 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $174 8 payments
  6. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $172 8 payments
  7. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $121 6 payments
  8. Coherus Biosciences Inc. $106 3 payments
  9. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $99 4 payments
  10. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $66 4 payments
  11. Other $223 11 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,141 130 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. EYLEA HD $739 29 payments
  2. OZURDEX $480 21 payments
  3. YUTIQ Chronic Non-infectious Posterior Segment Uveitis $383 7 payments
  4. DURYSTA $245 11 payments
  5. VABYSMO $221 13 payments
  6. Izervay $153 7 payments
  7. ILUVIEN $146 6 payments
  8. Cimerli $137 4 payments
  9. XIPERE $102 4 payments
  10. YUTIQ Treatment of chronic non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye $61 3 payments
  11. Other $705 35 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

596

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$28,105

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

37.1%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 181 $11,213
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 12 $9,904
Erythromycin Erythromycin Base Brand 111 $1,212
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 43 $1,068
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 57 $1,048
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 16 $982
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 23 $945
Ofloxacin Generic 79 $866
Latanoprost Generic 42 $591
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha Brand 18 $159

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,945,997

Of which drugs: $1,522,226

Medicare patients

932

Average age 76

Services billed

26,262

513 women, 419 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 39%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Depression 21%
Heart failure 20%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 72 1,913 $503,360
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 55 16,500 $455,258
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 89 678 $446,353
Injection, dexamethasone, intravitreal implant, 0.1 mg J7312 Office 12 105 $16,924

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 13 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $334
$334 — 1,913
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $65
$65 — —
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $60
$60 — 16,500
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $57
$57 — —
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $56
$56 — 105

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 13 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

130 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Retina Specialist in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record