Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tania Reyna

Neurology Tulsa, OK Medical Doctor

NPI 1316143621 CMS profile 195887

9001 S 101St East Ave Ste 190, Tulsa, OK 74133

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$353,405

692 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$596,459 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Tania Reyna of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $353,405 across 692 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $596,459 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $20,492 50
2024 General $4,124 34
2023 General $26,456 53
2022 General $9,024 35
2021 General $33,275 53
2020 General $50,657 133
2019 General $209,377 334

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tania Reyna
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tania Reyna were reported at $20,492. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Tania Reyna Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $209,377 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $50,657 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $33,275 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $9,024 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $26,456 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $4,124 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $20,492 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biogen, Inc. $76,008 108 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $70,251 84 payments
  3. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $48,415 70 payments
  4. EMD Serono, Inc. $36,371 108 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $30,557 63 payments
  6. Celgene Corporation $27,956 46 payments
  7. Genentech USA, Inc. $24,396 24 payments
  8. TG Therapeutics, Inc. $16,561 20 payments
  9. Horizon Therapeutics plc $7,675 14 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $6,220 19 payments
  11. Other $8,994 136 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $193,874 85 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $103,451 32 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $28,797 103 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $20,643 458 payments
  5. Honoraria $6,000 1 payment
  6. Education $579 11 payments
  7. Gift $60 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TYSABRI $36,086 56 payments
  2. LEMTRADA $35,644 37 payments
  3. AUBAGIO Multiple Sclerosis $19,642 24 payments
  4. ZEPOSIA $19,403 40 payments
  5. Soliris $18,677 26 payments
  6. MAYZENT $17,066 22 payments
  7. OCREVUS $16,647 15 payments
  8. Mavenclad $16,320 32 payments
  9. TECFIDERA $15,647 31 payments
  10. AUBAGIO Neurology $14,136 18 payments
  11. Other $66,487 269 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

847

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,027,463

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

31.5%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enspryng Satralizumab-Mwge Brand 16 $282,033
Mayzent Siponimod Brand 15 $161,654
Aubagio Teriflunomide Brand 15 $139,437
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 13 $128,956
Gilenya Fingolimod Hcl Brand 12 $125,532
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 55 $97,164
Dalfampridine Er Dalfampridine Brand 105 $43,123
Glatopa Glatiramer Acetate Brand 14 $37,632
Baclofen Generic 162 $3,353
Gabapentin Generic 111 $2,262

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 24 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$54,270

Of which drugs: $32,713

Medicare patients

104

Average age 65

Services billed

6,835

71 women, 33 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Arthritis 51%
Depression 47%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Heart failure 22%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Osteoporosis 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 13 6,360 $31,471

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BRIUMVI
  • TG Therapeutics, Inc. $1,845
$1,845 — —
KESIMPTA
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $328
$328 — —
SOLIRIS
  • Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $224
$224 — —
ZEPOSIA
  • Celgene Corporation $173
$173 — —
LEMTRADA
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $149
$149 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

692 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record