Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tamara Smith

Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care Dearborn, MI Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1841853223 CMS profile 10529076

6050 Greenfield Rd Ste 101, Dearborn, MI 48126

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,295

108 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tamara Smith of Dearborn, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,295 across 108 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $739 23
2024 General $999 32
2023 General $954 32
2022 General $603 21

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tamara Smith
  • Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tamara Smith were reported at $739. Among 11,827 Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles paid that year, the median was $152 and the middle half received between $48 and $458.

Show as a table
Year Tamara Smith Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $0 $123 $38–$327 $132
2022 $603 $130 $44–$369 $149
2023 $954 $144 $49–$410 $160
2024 $999 $146 $48–$433 $164
2025 $739 $152 $48–$458 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $928 21 payments
  2. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. $537 19 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $425 8 payments
  4. Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $197 9 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $180 9 payments
  6. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $131 3 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $125 1 payment
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $122 7 payments
  9. Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc. $108 2 payments
  10. Novo Nordisk Inc $89 4 payments
  11. Other $454 25 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,195 107 payments
  2. Education $100 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. LifeVest $928 21 payments
  2. AMVUTTRA $338 11 payments
  3. VERQUVO $227 11 payments
  4. FARXIGA $225 6 payments
  5. ONPATTRO $198 8 payments
  6. NUZYRA $197 9 payments
  7. BRILINTA $131 2 payments
  8. XARELTO $131 3 payments
  9. CAMZYOS $125 1 payment
  10. OPTIMIZER $108 2 payments
  11. Other $936 47 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

108 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record