Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Syed Shah

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Fort Worth, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1720039480 CMS profile 305333

1001 12Th Ave Ste 134, Fort Worth, TX 76104

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,946

184 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$35,909 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2021

Through program year 2025, Syed Shah of Fort Worth, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,946 across 184 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $35,909 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 18th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $378 26
2024 General $374 19
2023 General $707 40
2022 General $867 34
2021 General $473 22
2020 General $378 14
2019 General $770 29

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Syed Shah
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Syed Shah were reported at $378. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Syed Shah Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $770 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $378 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $473 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $867 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $707 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $374 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $378 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $1,837 76 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $504 32 payments
  3. Biosense Webster, Inc. $184 4 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $159 8 payments
  5. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $155 9 payments
  6. HeartFlow, Inc. $154 2 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $138 9 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $138 8 payments
  9. Medtronic, Inc. $137 5 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $101 5 payments
  11. Other $440 26 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,946 184 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Confirm Rx $280 9 payments
  2. Fortify Assura, Ellipse ICD Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Failure $227 6 payments
  3. FFRct $154 2 payments
  4. LUX-Dx Insertable Cardiac Monitor $152 9 payments
  5. ASSURITY $145 11 payments
  6. AVEIR $144 3 payments
  7. Carto 3 System $138 2 payments
  8. Fortify Assura, Ellipse ICD Cardiac Rhythm Management $123 4 payments
  9. MULTAQ $112 6 payments
  10. MITRACLIP $110 2 payments
  11. Other $2,378 132 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 38 drugs

Part D claims

3,437

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 1,090

Drug cost

$1,219,904

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: $354,841

Branded share of claims

35%

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 38.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 656 $802,771
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 117 $125,042
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 85 $101,358
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 46 $59,662
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 31 $49,106
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 18 $21,185
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 15 $11,602
Mexiletine Hcl Generic 68 $8,646
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 422 $8,255
Diltiazem 12hr Er Diltiazem Hcl Brand 31 $6,141

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 38 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 79 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$273,729

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

911

Average age 78

Services billed

3,622

425 women, 486 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Atrial fibrillation 57%
Arthritis 54%
Ischemic heart disease 46%
Heart failure 36%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
COPD 27%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $58
$58 117 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $25
$25 — —
LOKELMA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $21
$21 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $21
$21 18 —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $14
$14 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

184 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record