Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Susan Weinkle

Bradenton, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1992897938 CMS profile 226508

5601 21St Ave W, Ste B, Bradenton, FL 34209

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$103,332

125 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$598,538

Paid to them · 68 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$672,436 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Susan Weinkle of Bradenton, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $103,332 across 125 general payments and $598,538 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $672,436 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

By program year

12 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $162 5
2024 General $36,308 13
2024 Research $456 2
2023 General $558 11
2023 Research $389,187 15
2022 General $28,854 34
2021 General $525 14
2021 Research $12,549 8
2020 General $10,540 6
2020 Research $113,074 29
2019 General $26,385 42
2019 Research $83,270 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Susan Weinkle
  • Florida median
  • Middle half of Florida
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Susan Weinkle were reported at $162. Among 84,641 Florida profiles paid that year, the median was $195 and the middle half received between $59 and $690.

Show as a table
Year Susan Weinkle Florida median Middle half National median
2019 $26,385 $197 $63–$719 $163
2020 $10,540 $126 $38–$436 $114
2021 $525 $151 $45–$537 $132
2022 $28,854 $175 $53–$607 $149
2023 $558 $183 $57–$637 $160
2024 $36,308 $185 $56–$647 $164
2025 $162 $195 $59–$690 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $48,248 12 payments
  2. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $22,981 32 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $19,208 49 payments
  4. Dermira, Inc. $5,622 5 payments
  5. Merz North America, Inc. $4,397 3 payments
  6. Almirall LLC $2,200 1 payment
  7. Revance Therapeutics, Inc. $214 5 payments
  8. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $77 3 payments
  9. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $70 4 payments
  10. Horizon Therapeutics plc $63 1 payment
  11. Other $253 10 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $95,925 15 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $3,436 99 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $2,500 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,418 4 payments
  5. Education $53 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BOTOX $12,359 13 payments
  2. BOTOX COSMETIC $11,073 23 payments
  3. QBREXZA $5,622 5 payments
  4. Xeomin $4,372 2 payments
  5. DAXXIFY $214 5 payments
  6. DYSPORT $130 1 payment
  7. ALTRENO $77 3 payments
  8. DYSPORT $70 2 payments
  9. BLU-U $70 4 payments
  10. TEPEZZA $63 1 payment
  11. Other $390 19 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $389,644 17 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $208,894 51 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

473

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$7,009

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

2.5%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 47 $2,556
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 145 $995
Metronidazole Generic 11 $719
Minoxidil Generic 74 $675
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 32 $478
Mometasone Furoate Generic 32 $434
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 15 $364
Cephalexin Generic 66 $358
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 12 $302
Spironolactone Generic 28 $90

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 66 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$407,166

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,107

Average age 79

Services billed

6,133

649 women, 458 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Diabetes 20%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Cancer 20%
Depression 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DAXXIFY
  • REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC. $164
$164 — —
LIBTAYO
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $20
$20 — —
Odomzo
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $8
$8 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

193 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record