Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Surjeet Dheer

Rheumatology Dover, DE Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1689024143 CMS profile 6877182

1100 Forrest Ave, Dover, DE 19904

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,020

315 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Surjeet Dheer of Dover, DE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,020 across 315 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 66th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,822 130
2024 General $1,836 88
2023 General $1,297 56
2022 General $1,065 41

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Surjeet Dheer
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Surjeet Dheer were reported at $2,822. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Surjeet Dheer Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $0 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $0 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,065 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,297 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,836 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,822 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,490 75 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,462 51 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $887 45 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $497 21 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $400 16 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $378 17 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $377 20 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $352 17 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $232 13 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $222 12 payments
  11. Other $723 28 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,412 308 payments
  2. Education $608 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,283 42 payments
  2. RINVOQ $909 41 payments
  3. Bimzelx $597 30 payments
  4. BENLYSTA $400 16 payments
  5. COSENTYX $376 16 payments
  6. TALTZ $357 16 payments
  7. SAPHNELO $352 17 payments
  8. SKYRIZI Immunology $325 17 payments
  9. Cimzia $290 15 payments
  10. SKYRIZI Immunology $256 17 payments
  11. Other $2,468 117 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

1,202

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$665,366

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 14 $195,214
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 11 $144,759
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 36 $140,364
Simponi Golimumab Brand 11 $72,314
Forteo Teriparatide Brand 13 $69,719
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 149 $10,268
Rasuvo Methotrexate/Pf Brand 13 $6,831
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 135 $5,225
Celecoxib Generic 99 $4,449
Leflunomide Generic 42 $4,068

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,813,572

Of which drugs: $1,649,381

Medicare patients

466

Average age 74

Services billed

180,843

389 women, 77 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 63%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Depression 21%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 16 9,150 $309,695
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 157 14,460 $294,706
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 20 75,200 $272,307
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 25 25,830 $220,862
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 21 18,450 $168,318
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 25 123 $573

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $297
$297 14 —
Cimzia
  • UCB, Inc. $204
$204 — 75,200
TALTZ
  • Lilly USA, LLC $164
$164 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $163
$163 — —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $162
$162 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

315 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Delaware

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record