Who Paid My Doc
Sudhakar Reddivalam
Pediatric Pulmonology Madera, CA Medical Doctor
NPI 1003969429 CMS profile 136429
9300 Valley Childrens Pl, Madera, CA 93638
General payments
$13,529
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Research they led as principal investigator
$394,045
Through program year 2025, Sudhakar Reddivalam of Madera, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,529 across 537 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $394,045 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.
General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Pediatric Pulmonology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
7 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $2,004 | 97 | |
| 2024 | General | $2,327 | 65 | |
| 2023 | General | $1,976 | 89 | |
| 2022 | General | $1,903 | 85 | |
| 2021 | General | $995 | 67 | |
| 2020 | General | $400 | 20 | |
| 2019 | General | $3,923 | 114 |
Beside peers
- Sudhakar Reddivalam
- Pediatric Pulmonology median
- Middle half of Pediatric Pulmonology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Sudhakar Reddivalam were reported at $2,004. Among 622 Pediatric Pulmonology profiles paid that year, the median was $139 and the middle half received between $60 and $405.
Show as a table
| Year | Sudhakar Reddivalam | Pediatric Pulmonology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $3,923 | $151 | $59–$495 | $163 |
| 2020 | $400 | $107 | $34–$339 | $114 |
| 2021 | $995 | $125 | $40–$511 | $132 |
| 2022 | $1,903 | $133 | $49–$428 | $149 |
| 2023 | $1,976 | $138 | $44–$494 | $160 |
| 2024 | $2,327 | $132 | $46–$398 | $164 |
| 2025 | $2,004 | $139 | $60–$405 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Records
537 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Pediatric Pulmonology in California
Sande Okelo
Pediatric Pulmonology · Los Angeles, CA
Rakesh Bhattacharjee
Pediatric Pulmonology · San Diego, CA
Carlos Milla
Pediatric Pulmonology · Palo Alto, CA
Terry Robinson
Pediatric Pulmonology · Palo Alto, CA
Marilynn Chan
Pediatric Pulmonology · San Diego, CA
Lauro Roberto
Pediatric Pulmonology · Fresno, CA
Related records
Pediatric Pulmonology in California
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Pediatric Pulmonology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in California
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.