Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stuart Nathan

Physician Assistant Westland, MI Physician Assistant

NPI 1407836869 CMS profile 11062126

8365 N Newburgh Rd, Westland, MI 48185

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,705

564 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Stuart Nathan of Westland, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,705 across 564 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,375 125
2024 General $1,784 98
2023 General $1,760 99
2022 General $1,886 115
2021 General $1,899 127

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stuart Nathan
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stuart Nathan were reported at $2,375. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Stuart Nathan Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $1,899 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $1,886 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $1,760 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $1,784 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $2,375 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,140 129 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $1,499 96 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $851 44 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $688 31 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $597 40 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $374 20 payments
  7. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $367 13 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $270 25 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $262 17 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $248 16 payments
  11. Other $2,409 133 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,705 564 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,979 119 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,543 106 payments
  3. JARDIANCE Diabetes $701 37 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $646 47 payments
  5. Kerendia $374 20 payments
  6. REXULTI $367 13 payments
  7. FARXIGA $349 11 payments
  8. ZEPBOUND $345 27 payments
  9. JARDIANCE Diabetes $327 21 payments
  10. EMGALITY $287 20 payments
  11. Other $7,088 410 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 85 drugs

Part D claims

2,886

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$388,721

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

22.4%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 72 $82,097
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 44 $55,066
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 41 $51,873
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 22 $35,070
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 33 $34,060
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 22 $29,491
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 20 $23,818
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 16 $15,609
Anoro Ellipta Umeclidinium Brm/Vilanterol Tr Brand 12 $8,685
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 12 $8,493

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 85 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 89 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$60,202

Of which drugs: $2,264

Medicare patients

182

Average age 70

Services billed

4,458

79 women, 103 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 32%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
COPD 29%
Depression 29%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Heart failure 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 11 11 $818

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $160
  • Lundbeck LLC $18
$178 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $137
$137 22 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $137
$137 44 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $126
$126 20 —
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $86
$86 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

564 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record