Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stuart Hetrick

Neurology Phoenix, AZ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1932101730 CMS profile 87197

4530 E Muirwood Dr, #111, Phoenix, AZ 85048

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$49,581

571 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,472

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$256,728 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2024

Through program year 2025, Stuart Hetrick of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $49,581 across 571 general payments and $1,472 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $256,728 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $898 29
2024 General $89 5
2023 General $1,285 40
2022 General $6,908 93
2022 Research $1,277 1
2021 General $13,549 123
2021 Research $195 1
2020 General $7,752 129
2019 General $19,100 152

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stuart Hetrick
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stuart Hetrick were reported at $898. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Stuart Hetrick Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $19,100 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $7,752 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $13,549 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $6,908 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $1,285 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $89 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $898 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Allergan Inc. $34,218 96 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $5,291 65 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,854 59 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $817 33 payments
  5. Biogen, Inc. $746 30 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $488 13 payments
  7. Lundbeck LLC $465 15 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $430 22 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $352 16 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $318 20 payments
  11. Other $4,601 202 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $34,937 23 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $12,401 537 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,200 10 payments
  4. Education $43 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BOTOX Neuroscience $16,998 17 payments
  2. BOTOX Neuroscience $15,990 13 payments
  3. UBRELVY Neuroscience $4,976 28 payments
  4. AIMOVIG $1,439 47 payments
  5. BOTOX Hyperhydrosis $776 54 payments
  6. KESIMPTA Neuroscience $508 20 payments
  7. OCREVUS $458 12 payments
  8. UBRELVY Neuroscience $438 34 payments
  9. KESIMPTA Neurology $413 11 payments
  10. Hizentra $300 9 payments
  11. Other $7,910 360 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $1,472 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 1 drug

Part D claims

320

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$444,778

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

100%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 320 $444,778

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 116 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$3,599,063

Of which drugs: $2,015,046

Medicare patients

2,728

Average age 74

Services billed

304,630

1,659 women, 1,069 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 60%
Depression 37%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Osteoporosis 21%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 359 234,717 $1,147,132
Injection, mepivacaine hydrochloride, per 10 ml J0670 Office 91 979 $2,601
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 90 1,331 $669
Injection, magnesium sulfate, per 500 mg J3475 Office 77 983 $411
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 85 726 $359
Injection, thiamine hcl, 100 mg J3411 Office 11 151 $209
Injection, promethazine hcl, up to 50 mg J2550 Office 16 72 $146
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 18 22 $111
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 32 118 $104
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 47 174 $96

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZEPOSIA
  • Celgene Corporation $35
$35 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

573 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record