Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Steven Zeig

Nephrology Hollywood, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1982693719 CMS profile 317259

3700 Washington St, Ste 500, Hollywood, FL 33021

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$32,606

157 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$15,300

Paid to them · 3 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$14,242,756 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Steven Zeig of Hollywood, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $32,606 across 157 general payments and $15,300 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $14,242,756 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $311 12
2024 General $1,693 20
2023 General $1,541 18
2022 General $13,267 29
2021 General $263 14
2021 Research $14,227 2
2020 General $2,547 6
2020 Research $1,074 1
2019 General $12,984 58

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Steven Zeig
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Steven Zeig were reported at $311. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Steven Zeig Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $12,984 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $2,547 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $263 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $13,267 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $1,541 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $1,693 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $311 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $14,566 25 payments
  2. Relypsa, Inc. $14,311 24 payments
  3. CSL Behring $1,369 7 payments
  4. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $863 34 payments
  5. Retrophin, Inc. $290 5 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $221 6 payments
  7. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $148 7 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $141 9 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $135 7 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $94 6 payments
  11. Other $469 27 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $25,352 16 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $4,019 130 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,627 9 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $600 1 payment
  5. Education $8 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Parsabiv Nephrology $11,931 14 payments
  2. Parsabiv Nephrology $2,501 3 payments
  3. Korsuva $1,181 2 payments
  4. ACTHAR $863 34 payments
  5. Veltassa $161 5 payments
  6. Kerendia $148 7 payments
  7. Tresiba $125 1 payment
  8. Ozempic $96 5 payments
  9. XARELTO $94 6 payments
  10. PREVNAR - 13 $67 4 payments
  11. Other $1,079 71 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $15,300 3 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 68 drugs

Part D claims

2,209

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$208,370

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

27.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 35 $35,391
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 22 $32,491
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 30 $27,198
Procrit Epoetin Alfa Brand 12 $24,995
Auryxia Ferric Citrate Brand 11 $22,429
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 16 $14,177
Lokelma Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Brand 13 $9,210
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 11 $6,616
Trulance Plecanatide Brand 12 $6,591
Fentanyl Generic 37 $5,845

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 68 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 12 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$22,338

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

39

Average age 74

Services billed

141

22 women, 17 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 54%
Diabetes 41%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Heart failure 28%
Atrial fibrillation 28%
Alzheimer's or dementia 0%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $261
$261 — —
SHINGRIX
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $27
$27 — —
PAXLOVID
  • PFIZER INC. $17
$17 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

160 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nephrology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record