Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Steven Gershon

Pain Medicine Virginia Beach, VA Medical Doctor

NPI 1073541736 CMS profile 48086

1133 First Colonial Rd., Virginia Beach, VA 23454

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$78,076

548 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$111

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$518,674 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2025

Through program year 2025, Steven Gershon of Virginia Beach, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $78,076 across 548 general payments and $111 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $518,674 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $10,963 75
2025 Research $111 1
2024 General $6,016 64
2023 General $36,761 109
2022 General $19,915 108
2021 General $1,080 54
2020 General $954 51
2019 General $2,387 87

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Steven Gershon
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Steven Gershon were reported at $10,963. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Steven Gershon Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,387 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $954 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $1,080 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $19,915 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $36,761 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $6,016 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $10,963 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $35,174 171 payments
  2. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $24,403 19 payments
  3. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $9,383 17 payments
  4. Nevro Corp. $825 14 payments
  5. Lundbeck LLC $658 24 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $613 38 payments
  7. Boston Scientific Corporation $520 6 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $497 31 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $344 16 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $311 10 payments
  11. Other $5,348 202 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $32,438 16 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $31,290 6 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $12,772 506 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,570 19 payments
  5. Education $7 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $29,617 112 payments
  2. QULIPTA $22,419 87 payments
  3. SEGLENTIS Pain Management $18,360 11 payments
  4. JOURNAVX Acute Pain $8,020 6 payments
  5. Seglentis Pain Management $6,043 8 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $574 35 payments
  7. AIMOVIG $537 22 payments
  8. ZAVZPRET $491 31 payments
  9. BOTOX $469 28 payments
  10. JOURNAVX Pain $358 7 payments
  11. Other $8,500 295 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $111 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 2 drugs

Part D claims

24

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 276

Drug cost

$491

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: $5,921

Branded share of claims

50%

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 11.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gabapentin Generic 12 $292
Acetaminophen-Codeine Acetaminophen With Codeine Brand 12 $199

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,591 Part D prescribers listed as Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$329,667

Of which drugs: $19,594

Medicare patients

826

Average age 73

Services billed

7,431

535 women, 291 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 32%
Diabetes 31%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
COPD 18%
Osteoporosis 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 78 723 $565
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 27 41 $295

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $4,806
$4,806 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $124
$124 — —
VYEPTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $120
$120 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $95
$95 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $83
$83 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

549 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record