Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Steven Eversley

Internal Medicine Ellicott City, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1144205865 CMS profile 233493

4801 Dorsey Hall Dr, Suite 201, Ellicott City, MD 21042

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,349

563 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Steven Eversley of Ellicott City, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,349 across 563 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,858 84
2024 General $1,726 80
2023 General $1,503 74
2022 General $1,430 80
2021 General $1,929 113
2020 General $858 61
2019 General $1,044 71

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Steven Eversley
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Steven Eversley were reported at $1,858. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Steven Eversley Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,044 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $858 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,929 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,430 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,503 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,726 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,858 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,263 72 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,146 66 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,002 57 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $914 41 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $690 38 payments
  6. Astellas Pharma US Inc $573 26 payments
  7. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $516 19 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $463 22 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $432 22 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $428 24 payments
  11. Other $2,921 176 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,256 561 payments
  2. Education $92 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,058 62 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $902 49 payments
  3. UBRELVY $582 35 payments
  4. Kerendia $516 19 payments
  5. JARDIANCE $499 28 payments
  6. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $442 17 payments
  7. FARXIGA $383 23 payments
  8. NURTEC ODT $380 21 payments
  9. TRULICITY $366 21 payments
  10. QULIPTA $354 23 payments
  11. Other $7,639 422 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 120 drugs

Part D claims

6,060

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$769,986

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 78 $115,541
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 78 $88,946
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 77 $84,847
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 48 $61,569
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 40 $60,783
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 22 $49,250
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 33 $48,151
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 23 $32,918
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 33 $30,432
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 18 $29,411

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 120 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 74 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$313,791

Of which drugs: $57,184

Medicare patients

414

Average age 74

Services billed

14,270

159 women, 255 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 43%
Ischemic heart disease 41%
Diabetes 25%
Depression 19%
Cancer 18%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Osteoporosis 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 18 1,623 $32,550
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 65 66 $19,084
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 69 69 $5,341

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $206
$206 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $118
$118 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $103
  • Lilly USA, LLC $14
$116 78 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $103
$103 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $100
$100 48 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

563 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record