Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Steven Barag

Family Medicine Rancho Cucamonga, CA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1366444838 CMS profile 288920

7974 Haven Ave, Suite 250, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$85,285

1,330 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$24,369

Paid to them · 9 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,730,685 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Steven Barag of Rancho Cucamonga, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $85,285 across 1,330 general payments and $24,369 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,730,685 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

11 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,997 115
2024 General $3,660 111
2024 Research $7,312 3
2023 General $16,420 178
2023 Research $795 1
2022 General $10,392 191
2022 Research $9,275 4
2021 General $26,513 278
2021 Research $6,987 1
2020 General $13,945 261
2019 General $11,359 196

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Steven Barag
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Steven Barag were reported at $2,997. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Steven Barag Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $11,359 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $13,945 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $26,513 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $10,392 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $16,420 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $3,660 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,997 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $22,012 130 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $13,508 45 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $12,581 48 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $7,652 116 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $6,064 101 payments
  6. Acerus Pharmaceuticals Corporation $3,856 7 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,976 95 payments
  8. Antares Pharma, Inc. $1,581 74 payments
  9. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,568 12 payments
  10. Novo Nordisk AS $1,514 4 payments
  11. Other $12,973 698 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $34,420 17 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $25,559 1,246 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $16,537 49 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $8,516 7 payments
  5. Education $253 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY Neuroscience $20,380 68 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $10,553 34 payments
  3. FARXIGA $5,057 63 payments
  4. Natesto $3,856 7 payments
  5. QULIPTA $2,883 34 payments
  6. EUCRISA $2,411 35 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT $1,800 23 payments
  8. Kerendia $1,037 53 payments
  9. XYOSTED $1,008 41 payments
  10. Ozempic $904 44 payments
  11. Other $21,978 1,182 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $24,321 8 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $48 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 156 drugs

Part D claims

10,398

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,623,253

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

26.8%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 262 $239,343
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 203 $225,266
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 161 $152,877
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 129 $123,552
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 75 $89,187
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 84 $78,926
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 34 $50,432
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 62 $49,053
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 26 $46,678
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 59 $46,355

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 156 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 9 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$57,594

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

237

Average age 72

Services billed

748

128 women, 109 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 53%
Diabetes 43%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Osteoporosis 17%
Cancer 16%
Depression 12%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
$280 161 —
XYOSTED
$226 — —
VOQUEZNA
$199 — —
KRYSTEXXA
$162 — —
ELIQUIS
$125 84 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

1,339 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record