Doctor of Podiatric Medicine Program year 2021 Reported 2019–2021 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Steven Bailey

Podiatrist St George, UT Doctor of Podiatric Medicine

NPI 1487754750 CMS profile 158307

1036 E Riverside Dr, Suite #C, St George, UT 84790

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,372

104 records reported · program years 2019–2021

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2021

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2021, Steven Bailey of St George, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,372 across 104 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 59th percentile of Podiatrist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2021 General $275 26
2020 General $372 37
2019 General $724 41

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Steven Bailey
  • Podiatrist median
  • Middle half of Podiatrist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Steven Bailey were reported at $0. Among 4,572 Podiatrist profiles paid that year, the median was $260 and the middle half received between $94 and $777.

Show as a table
Year Steven Bailey Podiatrist median Middle half National median
2019 $724 $196 $72–$601 $163
2020 $372 $118 $38–$335 $114
2021 $275 $169 $57–$573 $132
2022 $0 $220 $74–$782 $149
2023 $0 $208 $71–$635 $160
2024 $0 $237 $87–$681 $164
2025 $0 $260 $94–$777 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $784 75 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $146 12 payments
  3. Horizon Therapeutics plc $127 3 payments
  4. COMSORT, Inc $100 1 payment
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $68 4 payments
  6. Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. $36 2 payments
  7. Alfasigma USA, Inc. $34 2 payments
  8. Paragon 28, Inc. $33 1 payment
  9. Tactile Systems Technology Inc $27 2 payments
  10. Arthrosurface Incorporated $12 1 payment
  11. Other $6 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Food and Beverage $1,272 103 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $100 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Stravix Other Advanced Wound Management $189 12 payments
  2. SIVEXTRO $168 5 payments
  3. GRAFIX PL $139 16 payments
  4. GrafixPL $138 4 payments
  5. GRAFIX $138 4 payments
  6. KRYSTEXXA $127 3 payments
  7. EUCRISA $114 9 payments
  8. Oasis $113 12 payments
  9. STRAVIX Extremities & Limb Restoration $84 8 payments
  10. Grafix PL PRIME $81 11 payments
  11. Other $461 41 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

104 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Podiatrist in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record