Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stephen Mullis

Rheumatology Greenville, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1518295641 CMS profile 2776867

1025 Verdae Blvd Ste A, Greenville, SC 29607

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,438

400 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Stephen Mullis of Greenville, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,438 across 400 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 69th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,751 91
2024 General $2,435 93
2023 General $1,854 79
2022 General $613 32
2021 General $249 17
2020 General $107 6
2019 General $1,430 82

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stephen Mullis
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stephen Mullis were reported at $1,751. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Stephen Mullis Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,430 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $107 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $249 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $613 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,854 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,435 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,751 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $2,294 136 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,623 56 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $662 30 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $415 23 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $405 13 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $362 19 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $330 10 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $243 21 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $238 11 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $234 4 payments
  11. Other $1,632 77 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,296 398 payments
  2. Education $142 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Enbrel $738 43 payments
  2. RINVOQ $635 26 payments
  3. Otezla $545 33 payments
  4. TREMFYA $505 18 payments
  5. TAVNEOS $436 24 payments
  6. TALTZ $415 23 payments
  7. BENLYSTA $405 13 payments
  8. SAPHNELO $330 10 payments
  9. EVENITY $309 28 payments
  10. SIMPONI ARIA $307 16 payments
  11. Other $4,587 242 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 38 drugs

Part D claims

2,481

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$3,536,360

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

31.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 106 $761,878
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 102 $555,583
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 66 $532,734
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 46 $327,550
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 17 $199,607
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 22 $190,844
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 13 $167,773
Cosentyx Sensoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 19 $157,218
Simponi Golimumab Brand 23 $143,416
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 16 $111,431

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 38 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 99 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$914,695

Of which drugs: $778,350

Medicare patients

517

Average age 74

Services billed

81,826

360 women, 157 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 74%
High blood pressure 73%
Osteoporosis 46%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Depression 25%
Diabetes 24%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 88 9,060 $185,143
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 13 11,548 $104,767
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 35 175 $832
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 54 3,955 $400
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 13 433 $99
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 17 17 $75
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 12 35 $22

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $266
$266 46 —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $261
$261 123 —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $193
$193 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $140
$140 17 —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $122
$122 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

400 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record