Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stephen Lewellis

Dermatology Plover, WI Medical Doctor

NPI 1891152641 CMS profile 2790384

3750 Corporate Ave, Plover, WI 54467

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$73,312

153 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Stephen Lewellis of Plover, WI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $73,312 across 153 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $14,983 27
2024 General $34,632 44
2023 General $23,077 55
2022 General $446 23
2021 General $59 3
2019 General $115 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stephen Lewellis
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stephen Lewellis were reported at $14,983. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Stephen Lewellis Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $115 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $0 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $59 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $446 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $23,077 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $34,632 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $14,983 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $58,160 48 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $5,600 17 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $3,151 6 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $2,341 12 payments
  5. Botanix SB Inc $1,430 2 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $508 10 payments
  7. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $495 6 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $429 19 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $291 5 payments
  10. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $285 9 payments
  11. Other $623 19 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $32,210 13 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $26,621 11 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $9,647 15 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $4,587 111 payments
  5. Education $247 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SPEVIGO $58,003 46 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $2,973 4 payments
  3. SOFDRA $1,430 2 payments
  4. TREMFYA $508 10 payments
  5. VTAMA $405 10 payments
  6. SOTYKTU $389 12 payments
  7. DUPIXENT Immunology $291 14 payments
  8. ILUMYA $199 2 payments
  9. Bimzelx $183 5 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Immunology And Inflammation $178 2 payments
  11. Other $1,258 45 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 2 drugs

Part D claims

23

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$2,573

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 11 $2,462
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 12 $111

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SPEVIGO
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $31,547
$31,547 — —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $176
$176 — —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $140
$140 — —
CIBINQO
  • PFIZER INC. $139
$139 — —
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $120
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $17
$137 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

153 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Wisconsin

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record