Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stephen Flitman

Neurology Phoenix, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1023018223 CMS profile 91804

2601 N 3Rd St, Ste 125, Phoenix, AZ 85004

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$24,388

989 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$771

Paid to them · 4 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$4,344,732 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Stephen Flitman of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $24,388 across 989 general payments and $771 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $4,344,732 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,055 235
2024 General $4,942 204
2023 General $5,139 223
2023 Research $300 1
2022 General $4,246 188
2022 Research $399 2
2021 General $1,825 77
2021 Research $72 1
2020 General $776 43
2019 General $1,405 19

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stephen Flitman
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stephen Flitman were reported at $6,055. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Stephen Flitman Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,405 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $776 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $1,825 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $4,246 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $5,139 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $4,942 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $6,055 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,438 171 payments
  2. Biogen, Inc. $1,864 49 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,288 73 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,284 63 payments
  5. Eisai Inc. $1,241 38 payments
  6. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $801 13 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $779 30 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $750 33 payments
  9. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $742 34 payments
  10. EMD Serono, Inc. $708 18 payments
  11. Other $12,492 467 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $23,333 975 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $600 4 payments
  3. Education $315 9 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $140 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $1,494 105 payments
  2. TYSABRI $1,481 30 payments
  3. Leqembi $1,131 33 payments
  4. QULIPTA $1,050 85 payments
  5. KESIMPTA $783 52 payments
  6. Briviact $775 44 payments
  7. ZAVZPRET $757 29 payments
  8. REXULTI $705 32 payments
  9. ZEPOSIA $651 22 payments
  10. VUMERITY $586 17 payments
  11. Other $15,215 607 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $771 4 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 69 drugs

Part D claims

3,790

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$765,981

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

23.1%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gamunex-C Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 39 $170,563
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 12 $116,242
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 53 $79,199
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 12 $68,873
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 16 $49,085
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 23 $47,297
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 27 $44,357
Ongentys Opicapone Brand 14 $23,652
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 11 $16,428
Galantamine Er Galantamine Hbr Brand 105 $13,153

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 69 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 14 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$81,931

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

347

Average age 75

Services billed

2,783

207 women, 140 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 64%
Depression 36%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Alzheimer's or dementia 27%
Diabetes 25%
Osteoporosis 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 40 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Leqembi
$534 — —
ZEPOSIA
$338 — —
KESIMPTA
$316 12 —
REXULTI
$248 23 —
KISUNLA
$217 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 40 with Patron

Records

993 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record