Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stephanie Smith-Phillips

Dermatology Mount Pleasant, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1518922509 CMS profile 159999

570 Long Point Rd, Suite 200, Mount Pleasant, SC 29464

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,280

526 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$182,806 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Stephanie Smith-Phillips of Mount Pleasant, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,280 across 526 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $182,806 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,185 81
2024 General $2,261 95
2023 General $2,000 85
2022 General $1,371 63
2021 General $1,415 69
2020 General $664 44
2019 General $1,384 89

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stephanie Smith-Phillips
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stephanie Smith-Phillips were reported at $2,185. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Stephanie Smith-Phillips Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,384 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $664 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,415 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $1,371 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $2,000 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $2,261 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $2,185 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $979 61 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $879 33 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $662 32 payments
  4. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $630 10 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $608 26 payments
  6. Almirall LLC $581 28 payments
  7. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $544 30 payments
  8. LEO Pharma Inc. $484 24 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $466 20 payments
  10. Mayne Pharma Inc. $456 31 payments
  11. Other $4,990 231 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,145 523 payments
  2. Education $135 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $916 28 payments
  2. DUPIXENT $730 30 payments
  3. Zoryve $617 9 payments
  4. CIBINQO $510 31 payments
  5. EUCRISA $492 36 payments
  6. Otezla $431 18 payments
  7. OPZELURA $345 17 payments
  8. VTAMA $334 16 payments
  9. Klisyri $328 14 payments
  10. RINVOQ $318 14 payments
  11. Other $7,342 383 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

1,520

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$308,691

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

14%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 15 $205,095
Otezla Apremilast Brand 12 $57,353
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 97 $5,226
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 118 $4,800
Metronidazole Generic 63 $4,603
Azelaic Acid Generic 30 $4,297
Tavaborole Generic 11 $3,450
Tacrolimus Generic 37 $3,087
Ammonium Lactate Generic 114 $2,427
Tretinoin Generic 58 $2,225

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 88 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$392,196

Of which drugs: $99

Medicare patients

1,377

Average age 75

Services billed

7,070

910 women, 467 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 61%
Arthritis 49%
Osteoporosis 22%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Cancer 17%
Depression 15%
Diabetes 14%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 29 34 $77
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 23 32 $22

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $202
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $45
$247 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $239
$239 15 —
DAXXIFY
  • REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC. $202
$202 — —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $167
$167 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $150
$150 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

526 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record