Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stephanie Jeffrey

Nurse Practitioner Richmond, VA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1245343938 CMS profile 10560940

9109 Stony Point Dr, Richmond, VA 23235

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,976

177 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Stephanie Jeffrey of Richmond, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,976 across 177 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $122 1
2023 General $1,323 50
2022 General $1,557 72
2021 General $975 54

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stephanie Jeffrey
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stephanie Jeffrey were reported at $122. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Stephanie Jeffrey Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $975 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $1,557 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $1,323 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $0 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $122 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $845 35 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $725 23 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $643 39 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $505 15 payments
  5. OptiNose US, Inc. $260 12 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $136 6 payments
  7. CSL Behring $132 7 payments
  8. kaleo, Inc. $130 7 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $83 4 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $76 4 payments
  11. Other $440 25 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,976 177 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,054 32 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $725 23 payments
  3. FASENRA $642 22 payments
  4. NUCALA $556 28 payments
  5. Xhance $260 12 payments
  6. AUVI-Q $130 7 payments
  7. TEZSPIRE Respiratory $128 7 payments
  8. TEZSPIRE Inflammation $116 5 payments
  9. Haegarda $110 6 payments
  10. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $88 11 payments
  11. Other $831 45 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

177 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record