Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stanley Tao

Ophthalmology Toledo, OH Medical Doctor

NPI 1811934805 CMS profile 309551

5085 Monroe St, Ste. A, Toledo, OH 43623

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,525

165 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Stanley Tao of Toledo, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,525 across 165 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,085 51
2024 General $1,341 42
2023 General $1,600 30
2022 General $1,763 14
2021 General $200 10
2020 General $99 5
2019 General $6,437 13

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stanley Tao
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stanley Tao were reported at $1,085. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Stanley Tao Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $6,437 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $99 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $200 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $1,763 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $1,600 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,341 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $1,085 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Allergan Inc. $6,123 6 payments
  2. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $2,685 25 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,908 78 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $441 14 payments
  5. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $372 3 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $283 9 payments
  7. Astellas Pharma US Inc $220 4 payments
  8. Alcon Vision LLC $111 5 payments
  9. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $66 3 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $51 3 payments
  11. Other $267 15 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,441 161 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $6,000 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $65 2 payments
  4. Gift $19 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. OZURDEX Retina $6,123 6 payments
  2. ILUVIEN Ophthalmology $2,492 20 payments
  3. EYLEA HD $1,408 48 payments
  4. EYLEA $1,049 35 payments
  5. VABYSMO $283 9 payments
  6. OZURDEX Eye Care $256 6 payments
  7. YUTIQ $220 6 payments
  8. LUMIGAN $185 8 payments
  9. ILUVIEN treatment of diabetic macular edema in patients who have been previously treated with corticosteroid $170 4 payments
  10. Izervay $61 2 payments
  11. Other $657 36 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

2,120

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$113,812

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

31.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 39 $33,340
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 127 $15,520
Latanoprost Generic 750 $10,304
Cyclosporine Generic 13 $10,232
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 274 $7,846
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 28 $7,741
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 22 $7,407
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha Brand 257 $4,255
Brinzolamide Generic 12 $3,214
Bimatoprost Generic 29 $2,794

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,414,322

Of which drugs: $1,052,537

Medicare patients

1,174

Average age 74

Services billed

8,253

663 women, 511 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 41%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Depression 22%
Heart failure 19%
COPD 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 133 1,136 $736,181
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 23 856 $220,267
Injection, dexamethasone, intravitreal implant, 0.1 mg J7312 Office 11 126 $19,976
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 12 52 $35

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $317
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $74
$390 — 856
EYLEA
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $154
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $74
$228 — 1,136
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $168
$168 22 —
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $164
$164 — 126
ILUVIEN
  • Alimera Sciences, Inc. $85
$85 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

165 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Ohio

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record