Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stacy Calahan Davisson

Nurse Practitioner Denver, CO Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1689691651 CMS profile 10960874

777 Bannock St, Mc 7782, Denver, CO 80204

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,340

116 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Stacy Calahan Davisson of Denver, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,340 across 116 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $625 30
2024 General $502 26
2023 General $663 29
2022 General $535 30
2021 General $16 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stacy Calahan Davisson
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stacy Calahan Davisson were reported at $625. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Stacy Calahan Davisson Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $16 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $535 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $663 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $502 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $625 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $438 21 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $315 18 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $276 15 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $169 9 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $160 8 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $111 6 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $100 5 payments
  8. Exact Sciences Corporation $82 4 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $81 4 payments
  10. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $79 2 payments
  11. Other $529 24 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,340 116 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. MOUNJARO $224 13 payments
  2. FreeStyle Libre 3 $211 9 payments
  3. UBRELVY $196 11 payments
  4. FreeStyle Libre 2 $183 10 payments
  5. Repatha $102 5 payments
  6. Otezla $102 5 payments
  7. SHINGRIX $100 5 payments
  8. Cologuard Collection Kit $82 4 payments
  9. Ozempic $80 4 payments
  10. ZEPBOUND $79 5 payments
  11. Other $1,463 74 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

239

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$2,944

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

11.7%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 15 $494
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 13 $348
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 41 $341
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 28 $310
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 12 $283
Methadone Hcl Generic 11 $196
Montelukast Sodium Generic 12 $196
Furosemide Generic 15 $142
Losartan Potassium Generic 15 $128
Potassium Chloride Generic 12 $118

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $120
$120 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $43
$43 — —
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $24
$24 — —
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $23
$23 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $22
$22 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

116 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record