Medical Doctor Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sriya Ranatunga

Rheumatology Springfield, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1689662314 CMS profile 866361

751 N Rutledge St Ste 2100, Springfield, IL 62702

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,984

14 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Sriya Ranatunga of Springfield, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,984 across 14 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $1,456 2
2023 General $1,352 3
2022 General $1,350 1
2021 General $2,250 2
2020 General $4,725 2
2019 General $5,851 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sriya Ranatunga
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sriya Ranatunga were reported at $0. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Sriya Ranatunga Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $5,851 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $4,725 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,250 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,350 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,352 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,456 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $0 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $16,875 10 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $106 1 payment
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $3 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Consulting Fee $16,875 10 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $106 1 payment
  3. Education $3 3 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

1,522

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,479,203

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

33.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 71 $567,280
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 38 $288,600
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 20 $178,483
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 13 $96,731
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 14 $91,311
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 11 $72,597
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 11 $66,612
Otezla Apremilast Brand 13 $63,414
Prolia Denosumab Brand 15 $25,807
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 220 $7,700

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$19,022

Of which drugs: $1,386

Medicare patients

106

Average age 68

Services billed

429

74 women, 32 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Diabetes 29%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
COPD 23%
Heart failure 22%
Depression 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 21 127 $96

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

14 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record