Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Singh Boun

Family Medicine Monterey Park, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1801855028 CMS profile 353769

210 N Garfield Ave, Suite 201, Monterey Park, CA 91754

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$46,471

1,933 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Singh Boun of Monterey Park, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $46,471 across 1,933 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,599 265
2024 General $6,122 230
2023 General $6,946 276
2022 General $7,440 302
2021 General $7,048 355
2020 General $5,085 255
2019 General $7,230 250

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Singh Boun
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Singh Boun were reported at $6,599. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Singh Boun Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $7,230 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $5,085 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $7,048 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $7,440 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $6,946 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $6,122 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $6,599 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $7,890 239 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $3,554 109 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $3,174 131 payments
  4. Amarin Pharma Inc. $2,807 121 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $2,603 116 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $2,149 83 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,580 61 payments
  8. IBSA Pharma Inc. $1,572 98 payments
  9. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,563 91 payments
  10. Horizon Therapeutics plc $1,552 71 payments
  11. Other $18,027 813 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $46,355 1,928 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $59 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $37 1 payment
  4. Education $20 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $3,979 138 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,950 93 payments
  3. XIFAXAN $1,813 104 payments
  4. Otezla $1,796 58 payments
  5. Vascepa $1,675 92 payments
  6. Licart $1,572 98 payments
  7. Repatha $1,449 56 payments
  8. BREZTRI $1,367 22 payments
  9. LINZESS $1,260 53 payments
  10. AIRSUPRA $1,180 31 payments
  11. Other $40,774 1,844 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 192 drugs

Part D claims

16,196

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$3,717,074

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

39.8%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 738 $327,366
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 344 $257,998
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 315 $224,734
Licart Diclofenac Epolamine Brand 206 $209,851
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 260 $174,683
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 84 $140,465
Nexlizet Bempedoic Acid/Ezetimibe Brand 251 $120,057
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 182 $112,974
Vemlidy Tenofovir Alafenamide Brand 71 $98,772
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 141 $95,088

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 192 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$661,301

Of which drugs: $352

Medicare patients

678

Average age 78

Services billed

13,028

410 women, 268 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 59%
Diabetes 55%
COPD 55%
Chronic kidney disease 46%
Osteoporosis 44%
Ischemic heart disease 38%
Alzheimer's or dementia 29%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 21 83 $81
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 19 79 $59

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 45 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$515 28 —
FARXIGA
$476 315 —
BREZTRI
$465 141 —
LINZESS
$305 182 —
IBSRELA
$299 24 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 45 with Patron

Records

1,933 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record