Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Simon Oh

Neurology Aurora, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1649236191 CMS profile 301789

1444 S. Potomac St, #280, Aurora, CO 80012

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$112,381

1,369 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Simon Oh of Aurora, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $112,381 across 1,369 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $16,338 158
2024 General $7,389 175
2023 General $12,796 202
2022 General $28,041 243
2021 General $21,201 216
2020 General $5,820 159
2019 General $20,795 216

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Simon Oh
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Simon Oh were reported at $16,338. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Simon Oh Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $20,795 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $5,820 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $21,201 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $28,041 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $12,796 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $7,389 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $16,338 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $35,355 229 payments
  2. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $15,801 75 payments
  3. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $11,560 74 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $7,245 44 payments
  5. Argenx US, Inc. $7,027 56 payments
  6. Grifols USA, LLC $6,353 18 payments
  7. LivaNova USA, Inc. $4,656 35 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $2,999 81 payments
  9. SK Life Science, Inc. $2,367 30 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $2,140 70 payments
  11. Other $16,878 657 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $53,886 54 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $34,454 1,262 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $15,385 7 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $8,443 40 payments
  5. Education $213 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $23,538 127 payments
  2. AJOVY $11,177 58 payments
  3. BOTOX $9,038 12 payments
  4. VYVGART Hytrulo $6,915 53 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT $6,681 19 payments
  6. Gamunex-C $6,481 19 payments
  7. QULIPTA $5,665 76 payments
  8. ULTOMIRIS $4,887 31 payments
  9. Soliris $4,837 36 payments
  10. VNS Therapy $2,652 16 payments
  11. Other $29,724 1,012 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 56 drugs

Part D claims

2,640

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$3,109,335

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

38.3%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gamunex-C Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 234 $1,711,841
Panzyga Immun Glob G(Igg)-Ifas/Glycine Brand 26 $384,633
Gammaked Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 33 $382,714
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 21 $203,688
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 16 $88,860
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 75 $67,073
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 54 $65,086
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 41 $47,512
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 17 $23,004
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 12 $20,776

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 56 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$517,087

Of which drugs: $254,615

Medicare patients

675

Average age 75

Services billed

55,962

373 women, 302 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 63%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Depression 28%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Diabetes 25%
Osteoporosis 21%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 75 52,700 $254,615

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZEPOSIA
$630 — —
QULIPTA
$426 17 —
Gocovri
$426 — —
VYEPTI
$380 — —
BOTOX
$379 — 52,700

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

1,369 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record