Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Shyla Muriel

Internal Medicine Oxford, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1558387571 CMS profile 251603

220 Main St Ste 1A, Oxford, CT 06478

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,111

852 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Shyla Muriel of Oxford, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,111 across 852 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,654 147
2024 General $3,126 168
2023 General $3,296 177
2022 General $1,689 100
2021 General $1,340 79
2020 General $1,967 113
2019 General $1,039 68

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Shyla Muriel
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Shyla Muriel were reported at $2,654. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Shyla Muriel Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,039 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,967 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,340 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,689 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,296 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,126 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,654 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,822 173 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,849 101 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,366 76 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,361 72 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,106 53 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $1,025 74 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $838 45 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $580 27 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $453 21 payments
  10. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $429 24 payments
  11. Other $3,281 186 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,110 851 payments
  2. Education $1 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $1,143 66 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,071 57 payments
  3. FARXIGA $1,058 55 payments
  4. QULIPTA $873 53 payments
  5. Ozempic $828 39 payments
  6. JARDIANCE $739 41 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $729 35 payments
  8. BREZTRI $716 30 payments
  9. VRAYLAR $659 38 payments
  10. GEMTESA $587 40 payments
  11. Other $12,269 705 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 154 drugs

Part D claims

10,303

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$802,083

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

18.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 97 $105,436
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 42 $71,491
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 49 $71,283
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 46 $63,642
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 38 $34,822
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 26 $32,601
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 19 $32,155
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 19 $30,877
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 33 $28,100
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 17 $27,591

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 154 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$124,535

Of which drugs: $10,995

Medicare patients

350

Average age 76

Services billed

2,098

241 women, 109 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 49%
Diabetes 25%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Depression 23%
Osteoporosis 22%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 31 31 $9,009
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 25 25 $1,853

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 40 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$336 — —
BREZTRI
$294 17 —
JARDIANCE
$216 42 —
UBRELVY
$209 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$206 33 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 40 with Patron

Records

852 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record