Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Shuaib Latif

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Stamford, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1275733537 CMS profile 827268

29 Hospital Plaza, Suite 501, Stamford, CT 06902

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,251

264 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Shuaib Latif of Stamford, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,251 across 264 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 27th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $816 26
2024 General $869 27
2023 General $1,092 31
2022 General $1,880 38
2021 General $1,136 23
2020 General $637 41
2019 General $820 78

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Shuaib Latif
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Shuaib Latif were reported at $816. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Shuaib Latif Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $820 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $637 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $1,136 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $1,880 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $1,092 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $869 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $816 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $3,807 68 payments
  2. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $1,412 116 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $743 35 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $499 26 payments
  5. Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc. $286 6 payments
  6. Boston Scientific Corporation $209 2 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $112 6 payments
  8. Respicardia, Inc. $107 1 payment
  9. Scpharmaceuticals Inc. $44 2 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $20 1 payment
  11. Other $12 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,181 263 payments
  2. Education $70 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SelectSecure Leads $1,526 26 payments
  2. ELIQUIS $731 34 payments
  3. Micra Pacemakers $507 12 payments
  4. LINQ II $417 7 payments
  5. MICRA Pacemakers $415 34 payments
  6. PAXLOVID $386 19 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT $373 16 payments
  8. CAMZYOS $355 20 payments
  9. SelectSecure Leads $290 22 payments
  10. AURORA EV-ICD MRI SURESCAN $280 3 payments
  11. Other $3,176 120 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

2,172

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$644,492

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

34.3%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 329 $379,949
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 118 $116,471
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 52 $71,309
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 12 $18,653
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 23 $17,089
Flecainide Acetate Generic 138 $8,421
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 264 $6,571
Dofetilide Generic 12 $4,804
Dabigatran Etexilate Dabigatran Etexilate Mesylate Brand 16 $3,658
Amiodarone Hcl Generic 143 $3,097

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 67 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$218,053

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

2,662

Average age 78

Services billed

6,454

1,355 women, 1,307 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 61%
Ischemic heart disease 51%
Atrial fibrillation 50%
Heart failure 48%
Chronic kidney disease 47%
Diabetes 41%
Depression 34%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
CAMZYOS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $141
$141 — —
ELIQUIS
  • PFIZER INC. $104
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $22
$127 329 —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $74
$74 — —
PAXLOVID
  • PFIZER INC. $38
$38 — —
BRILINTA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $14
$14 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

264 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record