Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Shu Lee

Internal Medicine Daly City, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1689614992 CMS profile 30338

1800 Sullivan Ave, Suite 105, Daly City, CA 94015

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,161

473 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Shu Lee of Daly City, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,161 across 473 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $385 14
2024 General $1,129 62
2023 General $2,145 105
2022 General $1,990 101
2021 General $1,533 66
2020 General $1,177 42
2019 General $3,802 83

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Shu Lee
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Shu Lee were reported at $385. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Shu Lee Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,802 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,177 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,533 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,990 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,145 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,129 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $385 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $5,179 226 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,189 24 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,066 53 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $834 23 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $631 27 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $619 13 payments
  7. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $395 32 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $366 19 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $345 6 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $234 8 payments
  11. Other $1,303 42 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,158 472 payments
  2. Education $2 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XARELTO $3,947 202 payments
  2. INVOKANA $1,237 25 payments
  3. Ozempic $769 42 payments
  4. JARDIANCE $689 18 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $673 43 payments
  6. ELIQUIS $578 24 payments
  7. BREZTRI $490 10 payments
  8. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $482 11 payments
  9. AIRSUPRA $461 8 payments
  10. XIFAXAN $395 32 payments
  11. Other $3,954 141 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 146 drugs

Part D claims

12,487

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,666,772

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

17%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 292 $453,487
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 96 $148,561
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 81 $97,300
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 55 $74,772
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 1,209 $65,610
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 29 $62,142
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 32 $47,855
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 43 $43,746
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 52 $42,705
Vemlidy Tenofovir Alafenamide Brand 30 $39,932

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 146 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 25 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$73,335

Of which drugs: $5,087

Medicare patients

153

Average age 76

Services billed

776

105 women, 48 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 67%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
Arthritis 27%
Osteoporosis 25%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
COPD 14%
Heart failure 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 50 50 $4,091

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $326
$326 — —
XARELTO
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $173
$173 43 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $147
$147 29 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $147
$147 55 —
LOREEV XR
  • Almatica Pharma LLC $62
$62 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

473 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record