Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sherry Rotunda

MOHS-Micrographic Surgery Oceanside, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1154355097 CMS profile 188014

3613 Vista Way, Oceanside, CA 92056

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,614

256 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$93,631 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Sherry Rotunda of Oceanside, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,614 across 256 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $93,631 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 77th percentile of MOHS-Micrographic Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $760 27
2024 General $1,313 62
2023 General $1,167 47
2022 General $807 41
2021 General $688 34
2020 General $161 9
2019 General $719 36

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sherry Rotunda
  • MOHS-Micrographic Surgery median
  • Middle half of MOHS-Micrographic Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sherry Rotunda were reported at $760. Among 1,077 MOHS-Micrographic Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $465 and the middle half received between $145 and $1,066.

Show as a table
Year Sherry Rotunda MOHS-Micrographic Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $719 $316 $106–$785 $163
2020 $161 $162 $68–$412 $114
2021 $688 $243 $87–$654 $132
2022 $807 $300 $102–$887 $149
2023 $1,167 $364 $125–$1,010 $160
2024 $1,313 $445 $142–$1,108 $164
2025 $760 $465 $145–$1,066 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,011 53 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $583 24 payments
  3. LEO Pharma Inc. $511 29 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $390 20 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $362 13 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $354 19 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $299 9 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $275 9 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $257 13 payments
  10. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $229 10 payments
  11. Other $1,344 57 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,424 254 payments
  2. Education $190 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $652 23 payments
  2. RINVOQ $556 30 payments
  3. ADBRY $422 24 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $379 20 payments
  5. SOTYKTU $362 13 payments
  6. LIBTAYO $330 12 payments
  7. EUCRISA $321 17 payments
  8. ILUMYA $316 16 payments
  9. Bimzelx $256 7 payments
  10. OPZELURA $204 4 payments
  11. Other $2,572 134 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

724

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$95,717

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

18%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 11 $78,043
Fluorouracil Generic 87 $5,745
Ketoconazole Generic 125 $2,208
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 45 $1,764
Betamethasone Diprop Augmented Betamethasone/Propylene Glyc Brand 62 $1,109
Mupirocin Generic 84 $754
Finasteride Generic 34 $638
Metronidazole Generic 15 $586
Ciclopirox Ciclopirox Olamine Brand 18 $584
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 27 $535

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 88 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$763,963

Of which drugs: $166,935

Medicare patients

876

Average age 77

Services billed

8,689

523 women, 353 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 61%
Arthritis 50%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Osteoporosis 20%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Diabetes 17%
Cancer 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 15 23 $55
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 24 52 $39

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ADBRY
  • LEO Pharma Inc. $211
$211 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $199
$199 — —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $158
$158 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $120
$120 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $119
$119 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

256 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record