Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sherri Haas

Pain Medicine Edina, MN Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1366686370 CMS profile 197909

7235 Ohms Ln, Edina, MN 55439

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$50,687

220 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$460

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$51,320 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2024

Through program year 2025, Sherri Haas of Edina, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $50,687 across 220 general payments and $460 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $51,320 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $591 14
2024 General $3,093 27
2023 General $1,229 11
2022 General $32,168 87
2021 General $9,669 36
2020 General $2,395 21
2020 Research $460 1
2019 General $1,542 24

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sherri Haas
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sherri Haas were reported at $591. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Sherri Haas Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,542 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $2,395 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $9,669 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $32,168 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $1,229 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $3,093 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $591 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $31,718 132 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $15,468 44 payments
  3. SI-BONE, Inc. $1,617 8 payments
  4. Medtronic USA, Inc. $769 11 payments
  5. Medtronic, Inc. $621 12 payments
  6. Nevro Corp. $272 5 payments
  7. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $97 2 payments
  8. BIOTRONIK NRO, Inc. $43 1 payment
  9. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $21 1 payment
  10. Vertos Medical, Inc. $20 1 payment
  11. Other $42 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $13,900 11 payments
  2. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $13,388 18 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $10,097 33 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $6,705 142 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $4,358 6 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $2,200 9 payments
  7. Education $40 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $13,409 35 payments
  2. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $6,827 25 payments
  3. WaveWriter Alpha Prime 16 $6,778 13 payments
  4. IonicRF Generator $4,000 5 payments
  5. General - Therapies $3,854 6 payments
  6. WAVEWRITER ALPHA $3,047 3 payments
  7. Neuromodulation Dspsbls and Accs $2,206 11 payments
  8. Proclaim DRG IPG $1,536 6 payments
  9. IFUSE IMPLANT SYSTEM $1,427 4 payments
  10. PRODIGY $1,114 4 payments
  11. Other $6,017 98 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic USA, Inc. $460 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

698

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 276

Drug cost

$28,675

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: $5,921

Branded share of claims

26.2%

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 11.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lyrica Pregabalin Brand 12 $10,708
Buprenorphine Generic 13 $3,479
Fentanyl Generic 26 $2,701
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 107 $2,248
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 74 $1,928
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 69 $1,789
Pregabalin Generic 77 $1,450
Gabapentin Generic 65 $1,020
Hydromorphone Hcl Generic 39 $812
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 21 $719

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,591 Part D prescribers listed as Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 67 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$143,370

Of which drugs: $6,000

Medicare patients

349

Average age 65

Services billed

2,615

253 women, 96 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 62%
Depression 59%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Osteoporosis 18%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
COPD 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 36 237 $1,191
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 17 128 $87

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

221 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Minnesota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record