Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Shari Ashton

Physician Assistant Manchester, NH Physician Assistant

NPI 1912940263 CMS profile 10713922

87 McGregor St, Suite 2100, Manchester, NH 03101

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$24,185

936 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Shari Ashton of Manchester, NH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $24,185 across 936 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,650 179
2024 General $7,027 249
2023 General $7,395 285
2022 General $2,713 144
2021 General $1,400 79

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Shari Ashton
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Shari Ashton were reported at $5,650. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Shari Ashton Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $1,400 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $2,713 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $7,395 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $7,027 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $5,650 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $5,766 176 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $3,783 86 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,712 136 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $2,442 59 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,504 81 payments
  6. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,209 47 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $1,022 47 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $813 65 payments
  9. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $811 43 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $648 25 payments
  11. Other $3,474 171 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,017 913 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,979 2 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,684 4 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,380 1 payment
  5. Education $1,125 16 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TREMFYA $5,676 159 payments
  2. DUPIXENT $2,983 72 payments
  3. SOTYKTU $2,562 76 payments
  4. TALTZ $1,304 74 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $1,296 57 payments
  6. RINVOQ $940 52 payments
  7. Bimzelx $753 31 payments
  8. OLUMIANT $712 41 payments
  9. VTAMA $644 39 payments
  10. OPZELURA $591 29 payments
  11. Other $7,104 413 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 13 drugs

Part D claims

521

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$191,446

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

11.1%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 43 $172,842
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 124 $7,321
Fluorouracil Generic 47 $2,826
Tacrolimus Generic 15 $1,667
Metronidazole Generic 26 $1,522
Fluconazole Generic 47 $1,189
Ketoconazole Generic 49 $1,008
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 33 $950
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 19 $696
Alclometasone Dipropionate Generic 24 $598

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 13 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 53 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$253,192

Of which drugs: $167,976

Medicare patients

660

Average age 74

Services billed

3,479

389 women, 271 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 18%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Depression 17%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Osteoporosis 15%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 15 21 $6,499
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 12 27 $21

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$3,503 — —
DUPIXENT
$473 43 —
SOTYKTU
$377 — —
Bimzelx
$366 — —
RINVOQ
$327 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

936 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in New Hampshire

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record