Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Shane Havens

Ophthalmology Omaha, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1548498447 CMS profile 1260821

988102 Nebraska Medical Ctr, Omaha, NE 68198

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,271

219 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,000 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Shane Havens of Omaha, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,271 across 219 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,000 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $643 39
2024 General $1,204 42
2023 General $2,473 64
2022 General $698 28
2021 General $676 24
2020 General $162 8
2019 General $415 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Shane Havens
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Shane Havens were reported at $643. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Shane Havens Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $415 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $162 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $676 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $698 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $2,473 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,204 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $643 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Glaukos Corporation $1,290 15 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $956 64 payments
  3. New World Medical,Inc. $716 11 payments
  4. Alcon Vision LLC $646 14 payments
  5. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $510 30 payments
  6. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $441 22 payments
  7. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $276 11 payments
  8. Sight Sciences, Inc. $242 7 payments
  9. Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited $224 9 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $201 6 payments
  11. Other $768 30 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,293 209 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $924 8 payments
  3. Education $54 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LUMIGAN $636 48 payments
  2. VYZULTA $481 28 payments
  3. Cequa $421 21 payments
  4. Xelpros $318 16 payments
  5. Ahmed Glaucoma Valve $277 5 payments
  6. Kahook Dual Blade $277 5 payments
  7. HYDRUS Microstent $258 4 payments
  8. TYRVAYA $241 9 payments
  9. Omidria $224 9 payments
  10. RayOne EMV $198 8 payments
  11. Other $3,966 152 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

3,734

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$279,508

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

34%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 158 $56,029
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 103 $53,232
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 39 $36,118
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 66 $22,605
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 36 $16,537
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 32 $14,527
Latanoprost Generic 1,336 $13,930
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 18 $8,917
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 55 $8,733
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 162 $7,471

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$272,235

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

791

Average age 77

Services billed

3,300

486 women, 305 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 25%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Depression 23%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Osteoporosis 20%
Cancer 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $230
$230 103 —
VYZULTA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $48
$48 158 —
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $46
$46 — —
Omidria
  • Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited $45
$45 — —
TYRVAYA
  • Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $35
$35 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

219 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record