Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Shalinee Singh

Pediatrics Bossier City, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1851397665 CMS profile 842798

2400 Hospital Dr, Ste 120, Bossier City, LA 71111

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,593

199 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Shalinee Singh of Bossier City, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,593 across 199 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Pediatrics profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $331 21
2024 General $506 50
2023 General $604 42
2022 General $432 31
2021 General $273 18
2020 General $76 6
2019 General $371 31

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Shalinee Singh
  • Pediatrics median
  • Middle half of Pediatrics
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Shalinee Singh were reported at $331. Among 22,296 Pediatrics profiles paid that year, the median was $97 and the middle half received between $37 and $210.

Show as a table
Year Shalinee Singh Pediatrics median Middle half National median
2019 $371 $86 $31–$183 $163
2020 $76 $49 $22–$110 $114
2021 $273 $68 $27–$158 $132
2022 $432 $77 $30–$173 $149
2023 $604 $88 $33–$190 $160
2024 $506 $94 $34–$206 $164
2025 $331 $97 $37–$210 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Corium, Inc. $797 79 payments
  2. Tris Pharma Inc $358 27 payments
  3. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $273 14 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $245 20 payments
  5. Ironshore Pharmaceuticals Inc. $220 13 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $172 11 payments
  7. Sanofi Pasteur Inc. $90 5 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $77 5 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $76 5 payments
  10. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $76 5 payments
  11. Other $209 15 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,593 199 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Azstarys $797 79 payments
  2. VYVANSE $200 13 payments
  3. Dyanavel XR Adhd $167 14 payments
  4. QELBREE Psychology $141 7 payments
  5. Qelbree Viloxazine Hydrochloride $132 7 payments
  6. JORNAY PM $120 7 payments
  7. Dyanavel XR Adhd $110 8 payments
  8. TRUMENBA $106 9 payments
  9. Quillivant $81 5 payments
  10. EUCRISA $79 7 payments
  11. Other $1,086 72 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

199 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pediatrics in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record