Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Seth Martin

Cardiovascular Disease Baltimore, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1861668154 CMS profile 1308138

600 N Wolfe St, Blalock 910, Baltimore, MD 21287

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$165,928

139 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$3,498

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$166,395 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2025

Through program year 2025, Seth Martin of Baltimore, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $165,928 across 139 general payments and $3,498 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $166,395 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $29,805 37
2025 Research $311 1
2024 General $42,829 28
2023 General $22,984 14
2023 Research $3,188 1
2022 General $14,651 10
2021 General $26,739 17
2020 General $23,826 21
2019 General $5,093 12

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Seth Martin
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Seth Martin were reported at $29,805. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Seth Martin Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $5,093 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $23,826 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $26,739 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $14,651 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $22,984 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $42,829 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $29,805 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. HeartFlow, Inc. $41,410 18 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $31,583 42 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $22,510 13 payments
  4. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $21,598 10 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $13,401 17 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $13,200 5 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $4,750 1 payment
  8. Kaneka Pharma America LLC $4,422 6 payments
  9. Premier Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $4,000 2 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $3,732 1 payment
  11. Other $5,321 24 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $122,684 47 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $30,611 12 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $7,981 64 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $3,877 14 payments
  5. Honoraria $775 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FFRct $41,410 18 payments
  2. Repatha Cardiology $21,135 13 payments
  3. CRESTOR $5,550 2 payments
  4. ELIQUIS $4,750 1 payment
  5. REPATHA Cardiovascular $4,739 8 payments
  6. LEQVIO $3,840 4 payments
  7. DISEASE STATE $3,792 2 payments
  8. Ozempic $2,668 3 payments
  9. LIPOSORBER $2,432 1 payment
  10. PRALUENT $2,247 1 payment
  11. Other $4,730 29 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,498 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 6 drugs

Part D claims

233

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$156,559

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

47.2%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 68 $98,022
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 42 $55,851
Ezetimibe Generic 51 $1,413
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 43 $790
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 16 $315
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 13 $168

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 16 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$28,010

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

506

Average age 69

Services billed

827

268 women, 238 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Ischemic heart disease 50%
Diabetes 41%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Heart failure 39%
Depression 35%
Atrial fibrillation 33%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $129
$129 — —
EVKEEZA
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $27
$27 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

141 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record