Who Paid My Doc
Seth Lapic
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Columbia, SC Doctor of Osteopathy
NPI 1497137038 CMS profile 1353656
11 Richland Medical Park Dr, Columbia, SC 29203
General payments
$240
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2022, Seth Lapic of Columbia, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $240 across 16 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 53rd percentile of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
3 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | General | $31 | 1 | |
| 2021 | General | $124 | 9 | |
| 2020 | General | $85 | 6 |
Beside peers
- Seth Lapic
- Child & Adolescent Psychiatry median
- Middle half of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Seth Lapic were reported at $0. Among 1,601 Child & Adolescent Psychiatry profiles paid that year, the median was $132 and the middle half received between $41 and $474.
Show as a table
| Year | Seth Lapic | Child & Adolescent Psychiatry median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | $129 | $42–$419 | $163 |
| 2020 | $85 | $81 | $28–$226 | $114 |
| 2021 | $124 | $115 | $31–$326 | $132 |
| 2022 | $31 | $124 | $40–$382 | $149 |
| 2023 | $0 | $130 | $45–$420 | $160 |
| 2024 | $0 | $141 | $42–$490 | $164 |
| 2025 | $0 | $132 | $41–$474 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 6 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$5,543
Medicare patients
22
Services billed
106
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 55% | |
| Osteoporosis | 0% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
16 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Child & Adolescent Psychiatry in South Carolina
Don Dubose
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Columbia, SC
Mary Theresa Ladd
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Charleston, SC
Merrie Cherry
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Lexington, SC
Victor Evans
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Lexington, SC
David Sherbondy
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Greenville, SC
Eman Sharawy
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Greenwood, SC
Related records
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry in South Carolina
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in South Carolina
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.