Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Seth Baum

Cardiovascular Disease Boca Raton, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1649210121 CMS profile 210853

7900 Glades Rd, Suite 400, Boca Raton, FL 33434

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$516,534

375 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$101,330

Paid to them · 40 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$10,548,196 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Seth Baum of Boca Raton, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $516,534 across 375 general payments and $101,330 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $10,548,196 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

13 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $64,979 30
2024 General $17,648 31
2024 Research $7,000 4
2023 General $49,130 76
2023 Research $21,184 9
2022 General $77,146 57
2022 Research $21,072 4
2021 General $73,438 39
2021 Research $3,723 6
2020 General $149,487 66
2020 Research $42,589 12
2019 General $84,707 76
2019 Research $5,762 5

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Seth Baum
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Seth Baum were reported at $64,979. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Seth Baum Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $84,707 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $149,487 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $73,438 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $77,146 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $49,130 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $17,648 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $64,979 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $133,016 104 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $68,699 38 payments
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $63,524 82 payments
  4. Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $55,752 26 payments
  5. Kaneka Pharma America LLC $44,754 3 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $36,410 21 payments
  7. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $31,730 23 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $20,380 29 payments
  9. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $15,899 16 payments
  10. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $11,387 5 payments
  11. Other $34,982 28 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $253,997 105 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $223,346 48 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $32,827 87 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $6,365 135 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Repatha $129,703 101 payments
  2. JARDIANCE Diabetes $63,079 34 payments
  3. EVKEEZA $44,560 36 payments
  4. TRYNGOLZA $34,152 11 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $24,181 28 payments
  6. LIPOSORBER Lipid Apheresis $22,095 1 payment
  7. LIPOSORBER Lipid Apheresis $20,159 1 payment
  8. OLEZARSEN $18,460 11 payments
  9. NEXLETOL $11,387 5 payments
  10. NEXLIZET $11,387 5 payments
  11. Other $47,949 33 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $52,797 12 payments
  2. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $40,037 19 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $5,918 6 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,528 2 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk AS $50 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 2 drugs

Part D claims

34

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$14,998

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

52.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 18 $14,784
Ezetimibe Generic 16 $214

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EVKEEZA
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $5,095
$5,095 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $3,866
$3,866 18 —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,040
  • Lilly USA, LLC $380
$3,420 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $77
$77 — —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $64
$64 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

415 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record