Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Scott Stoerner

Rheumatology Albuquerque, NM Medical Doctor

NPI 1053507715 CMS profile 364861

4901 Lang Ave Ne, Albuquerque, NM 87109

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,461

227 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Scott Stoerner of Albuquerque, NM is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,461 across 227 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 62nd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $748 51
2024 General $558 34
2023 General $632 29
2022 General $1,039 52
2021 General $499 26
2020 General $1,582 16
2019 General $402 19

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Scott Stoerner
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Scott Stoerner were reported at $748. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Scott Stoerner Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $402 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,582 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $499 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,039 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $632 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $558 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $748 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,369 5 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $979 75 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $596 26 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $465 24 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $394 16 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $232 12 payments
  7. Genentech USA, Inc. $186 10 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $157 8 payments
  9. Sobi, Inc $148 6 payments
  10. Horizon Therapeutics plc $145 7 payments
  11. Other $790 38 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,917 222 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,300 1 payment
  3. Education $244 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. OFEV $1,361 5 payments
  2. RINVOQ $630 43 payments
  3. Cimzia $446 21 payments
  4. TREMFYA $339 19 payments
  5. SAPHNELO $232 12 payments
  6. Actemra $186 10 payments
  7. SIMPONI ARIA $178 10 payments
  8. SKYRIZI $155 12 payments
  9. Bimzelx $150 5 payments
  10. KINERET $148 6 payments
  11. Other $2,051 107 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 43 drugs

Part D claims

2,508

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,523,488

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

35.9%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 97 $776,849
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 33 $368,190
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 51 $314,881
Stelara Ustekinumab Brand 12 $259,940
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 23 $166,087
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 15 $157,732
Orencia Abatacept Brand 19 $113,651
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 15 $106,671
Kineret Anakinra Brand 13 $71,196
Otezla Apremilast Brand 13 $62,457

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 43 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 62 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$936,625

Of which drugs: $850,605

Medicare patients

297

Average age 72

Services billed

52,351

223 women, 74 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 62%
Osteoporosis 33%
Depression 27%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Ischemic heart disease 16%
Cancer 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 29 6,975 $230,841
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 22 23,800 $85,673
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 13 1,410 $34,899
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 13 900 $18,439
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 48 320 $234
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 16 474 $108
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 31 65 $43

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $200
$200 15 —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $107
$107 — —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $88
$88 — —
KINERET
  • Sobi, Inc $37
$37 13 —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $28
$28 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

227 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in New Mexico

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record