Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Scott Rosman

Nurse Practitioner, Community Health Binghamton, NY Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1568750651 CMS profile 10749482

33 Mitchell Ave, Suite 102, Binghamton, NY 13903

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,697

486 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Scott Rosman of Binghamton, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,697 across 486 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Community Health profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,077 101
2024 General $3,131 152
2023 General $4,925 136
2022 General $1,775 56
2021 General $789 41

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Scott Rosman
  • Nurse Practitioner, Community Health median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Community Health
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Scott Rosman were reported at $2,077. Among 92 Nurse Practitioner, Community Health profiles paid that year, the median was $132 and the middle half received between $41 and $329.

Show as a table
Year Scott Rosman Nurse Practitioner, Community Health median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $789 $95 $27–$309 $132
2022 $1,775 $114 $33–$333 $149
2023 $4,925 $139 $42–$364 $160
2024 $3,131 $125 $42–$330 $164
2025 $2,077 $132 $41–$329 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. ViiV Healthcare Company $4,006 65 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,693 131 payments
  3. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $1,482 38 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $943 62 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $485 30 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $478 25 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $347 22 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $300 14 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $256 17 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $237 16 payments
  11. Other $1,469 66 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,037 484 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $2,660 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. DOVATO $3,567 46 payments
  2. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $1,504 67 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $653 51 payments
  4. UBRELVY $498 21 payments
  5. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $393 23 payments
  6. APRETUDE $380 16 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $355 23 payments
  8. Ozempic $342 22 payments
  9. LEQVIO $318 20 payments
  10. PIFELTRO $250 13 payments
  11. Other $5,086 257 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 196 drugs

Part D claims

10,211

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$4,647,244

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

36.5%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 385 $1,516,591
Symtuza Darunavir/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alaf Brand 64 $329,106
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 100 $245,450
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 72 $213,456
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 76 $203,352
Juluca Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 51 $167,868
Triumeq Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudi Brand 31 $129,096
Odefsey Emtricitab/Rilpiviri/Tenof Ala Brand 29 $123,789
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 112 $120,986
Isentress Raltegravir Potassium Brand 53 $101,138

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 196 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$18,355

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

124

Average age 62

Services billed

526

33 women, 91 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 62%
Arthritis 32%
Diabetes 27%
Depression 19%
COPD 17%
Ischemic heart disease 16%
Heart failure 11%
Atrial fibrillation 11%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $579
$579 15 —
DOVATO
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $498
$498 72 —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $165
  • Lilly USA, LLC $42
$207 78 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $130
$130 — —
APRETUDE
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $89
$89 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

486 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Community Health in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record