Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Scott Litwiller

Urology Tulsa, OK Medical Doctor

NPI 1558382028 CMS profile 70175

10901 E 48Th St, Tulsa, OK 74146

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$27,008

448 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Scott Litwiller of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $27,008 across 448 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Urology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $944 38
2024 General $1,295 52
2023 General $1,689 54
2022 General $6,013 75
2021 General $6,767 103
2020 General $2,394 46
2019 General $7,905 80

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Scott Litwiller
  • Urology median
  • Middle half of Urology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Scott Litwiller were reported at $944. Among 9,461 Urology profiles paid that year, the median was $629 and the middle half received between $190 and $1,620.

Show as a table
Year Scott Litwiller Urology median Middle half National median
2019 $7,905 $480 $147–$1,201 $163
2020 $2,394 $246 $87–$645 $114
2021 $6,767 $358 $111–$1,000 $132
2022 $6,013 $476 $143–$1,263 $149
2023 $1,689 $560 $168–$1,461 $160
2024 $1,295 $563 $170–$1,464 $164
2025 $944 $629 $190–$1,620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. $10,976 33 payments
  2. Astellas Pharma US Inc $8,688 61 payments
  3. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $851 59 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $558 28 payments
  5. Medtronic USA, Inc. $482 6 payments
  6. Boston Scientific Corporation $450 10 payments
  7. Urovant Sciences Inc $431 27 payments
  8. Coloplast Corp $396 19 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $393 21 payments
  10. Valencia Technologies Corporation $372 7 payments
  11. Other $3,411 177 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,984 436 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $7,967 3 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $7,563 3 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,236 5 payments
  5. Honoraria $258 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. MYRBETRIQ $8,386 45 payments
  2. Axonics $5,646 18 payments
  3. Axonics r-SNM System $5,300 12 payments
  4. Bulkamid $1,637 16 payments
  5. GEMTESA $1,159 81 payments
  6. XTANDI $859 49 payments
  7. ERLEADA $441 24 payments
  8. BOTOX $392 38 payments
  9. eCoin Device Kit $372 7 payments
  10. SpeediCath $351 17 payments
  11. Other $5,334 225 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

2,542

Median for Urology: 1,053

Drug cost

$395,874

Median for Urology: $101,464

Branded share of claims

42.3%

Median for Urology: 27.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 310 $204,277
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 161 $99,722
Estradiol Generic 406 $29,213
Solifenacin Succinate Generic 473 $22,813
Premarin Estrogens, Conjugated Brand 45 $14,928
Fesoterodine Fumarate Er Fesoterodine Fumarate Brand 42 $4,644
Trospium Chloride Generic 122 $4,438
Yuvafem Estradiol Brand 38 $3,423
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst Brand 233 $3,000
Movantik Naloxegol Oxalate Brand 24 $1,946

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 10,221 Part D prescribers listed as Urology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 116 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$209,563

Of which drugs: $11,744

Medicare patients

787

Average age 75

Services billed

13,247

660 women, 127 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 58%
Depression 31%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Osteoporosis 21%
Heart failure 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 14 1,771 $174
Injection, heparin sodium, per 1000 units J1644 Office 24 600 $111
Injection, testosterone cypionate, 1 mg J1071 Office 22 4,895 $93
Injection, garamycin, gentamicin, up to 80 mg J1580 Office 11 11 $21

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 14 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $239
$239 310 —
ORGOVYX
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $83
  • PFIZER INC. $16
$98 — —
ERLEADA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $98
$98 — —
XTANDI
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $69
  • PFIZER INC. $16
$84 — —
Trelstar
  • Verity Pharmaceuticals Inc. $45
$45 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 14 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

448 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record