Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Scott Kuykendall

Family Medicine Clarksville, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1316933575 CMS profile 331994

23 Professional Park Dr, Clarksville, AR 72830

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,811

620 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Scott Kuykendall of Clarksville, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,811 across 620 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,194 60
2024 General $1,461 84
2023 General $1,360 78
2022 General $1,238 81
2021 General $1,491 108
2020 General $1,456 100
2019 General $1,610 109

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Scott Kuykendall
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Scott Kuykendall were reported at $1,194. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Scott Kuykendall Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,610 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,456 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,491 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,238 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,360 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,461 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,194 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,604 76 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,478 116 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $983 58 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $831 49 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $608 43 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $538 36 payments
  7. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $502 28 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $427 28 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $407 34 payments
  10. Abbott Laboratories $253 16 payments
  11. Other $2,180 136 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,680 617 payments
  2. Education $130 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,110 40 payments
  2. Ozempic $767 45 payments
  3. VRAYLAR $702 58 payments
  4. BREZTRI $698 16 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $685 39 payments
  6. Kerendia $538 36 payments
  7. Repatha $474 29 payments
  8. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $468 32 payments
  9. AIMOVIG $457 24 payments
  10. BROVANA $441 24 payments
  11. Other $7,187 473 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 200 drugs

Part D claims

22,596

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,703,823

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

21.7%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 235 $237,180
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 168 $153,888
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 197 $147,330
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 187 $143,261
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 101 $101,111
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 135 $97,737
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 76 $85,872
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 55 $59,869
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 67 $57,164
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 27 $38,902

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 200 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 99 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$181,749

Of which drugs: $11,502

Medicare patients

499

Average age 71

Services billed

5,825

236 women, 263 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 37%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
COPD 18%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Depression 15%
Heart failure 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 32 32 $9,239
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 60 60 $1,314
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 57 146 $665
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 23 30 $24
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 16 30 $9

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $163
$163 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $158
$158 27 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $147
$147 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $125
$125 187 —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $114
$114 168 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

620 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record