Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Scott Checketts

Dermatology Layton, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1790762961 CMS profile 126061

2121 N 1700 W, Layton, UT 84041

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,398

171 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$8,214

Paid to them · 12 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$216,241 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Scott Checketts of Layton, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,398 across 171 general payments and $8,214 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $216,241 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 81st percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $187 11
2025 Research $1,085 1
2024 General $659 43
2024 Research $7,129 11
2023 General $540 49
2022 General $295 23
2021 General $417 24
2020 General $140 9
2019 General $161 12

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Scott Checketts
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Scott Checketts were reported at $187. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Scott Checketts Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $161 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $140 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $417 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $295 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $540 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $659 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $187 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $812 86 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $372 24 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $322 7 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $106 5 payments
  5. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $71 4 payments
  6. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $71 4 payments
  7. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $62 4 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $56 3 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $55 3 payments
  10. LEO Pharma Inc. $54 2 payments
  11. Other $418 29 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,143 168 payments
  2. Education $255 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI $568 67 payments
  2. TREMFYA $322 7 payments
  3. COSENTYX $292 19 payments
  4. HUMIRA $162 13 payments
  5. RINVOQ $133 10 payments
  6. Absorica LD $106 5 payments
  7. Winlevi $106 5 payments
  8. VTAMA $83 7 payments
  9. AKLIEF $62 4 payments
  10. ORACEA $62 4 payments
  11. Other $893 49 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $6,330 3 payments
  2. Sanofi US Services Inc. $1,884 9 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 13 drugs

Part D claims

405

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$13,907

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

6.4%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 96 $5,652
Cyclosporine Modified Cyclosporine, Modified Brand 15 $3,454
Minocycline Hcl Generic 25 $1,839
Ketoconazole Generic 35 $936
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 61 $613
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 13 $436
Finasteride Generic 64 $256
Terbinafine Hcl Generic 21 $197
Mupirocin Generic 12 $155
Prednisone Generic 22 $130

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 13 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 65 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$60,927

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

442

Average age 76

Services billed

1,412

209 women, 233 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 44%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Diabetes 28%
Depression 22%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Osteoporosis 16%
Cancer 15%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $136
$136 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $113
$113 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $108
$108 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $41
$41 — —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $32
$32 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

183 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record