Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Scott Andes

Internal Medicine Brooklyn, NY Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1891803037 CMS profile 358595

7001 Avenue U, Brooklyn, NY 11234

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,249

680 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Scott Andes of Brooklyn, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,249 across 680 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,187 114
2024 General $2,092 106
2023 General $1,837 75
2022 General $2,891 125
2021 General $3,463 159
2020 General $908 51
2019 General $872 50

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Scott Andes
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Scott Andes were reported at $2,187. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Scott Andes Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $872 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $908 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,463 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,891 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,837 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,092 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,187 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,548 128 payments
  2. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,712 89 payments
  3. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $1,516 52 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $876 51 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $760 45 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $659 34 payments
  7. ITI, Inc. $648 29 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $595 24 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $499 23 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $399 22 payments
  11. Other $4,037 183 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,202 679 payments
  2. Education $47 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NEXLETOL $1,516 52 payments
  2. XIFAXAN $1,297 80 payments
  3. NEXLIZET $757 6 payments
  4. TRULANCE $723 44 payments
  5. VRAYLAR $636 39 payments
  6. CAPLYTA $603 27 payments
  7. UBRELVY $551 32 payments
  8. LINZESS $513 32 payments
  9. CREON $502 31 payments
  10. QULIPTA $451 24 payments
  11. Other $11,483 553 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 274 drugs

Part D claims

21,573

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$5,120,879

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

33.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 1,114 $653,261
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 480 $567,716
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 272 $412,909
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 227 $245,528
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 353 $197,227
Ztlido Lidocaine Brand 441 $181,644
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 98 $160,426
Omeprazole-Sodium Bicarbonate Omeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate Brand 124 $151,812
Nuedexta Dextromethorphan Hbr/Quinidine Brand 69 $106,592
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 155 $105,090

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 274 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 174 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,996,707

Of which drugs: $5,343

Medicare patients

10,499

Average age 78

Services billed

44,956

6,828 women, 3,671 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 74%
Diabetes 64%
Ischemic heart disease 49%
Depression 42%
Heart failure 40%
Alzheimer's or dementia 40%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 36 36 $2,822
Influenza vaccine, trivalent, 0.5 ml dosage 90658 Office 53 53 $1,135
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 22 79 $77

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $191
$191 37 —
CAPLYTA
  • ITI, Inc. $161
$161 16 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $125
$125 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $96
$96 480 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $89
$89 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

680 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record