Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sayoko Moroi

Glaucoma Specialist Columbus, OH Medical Doctor

NPI 1427066125 CMS profile 1144172

915 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH 43212

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$28

1 record reported · program year 2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program year 2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$9,068 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2020

Through program year 2025, Sayoko Moroi of Columbus, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $28 across 1 general payment and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $9,068 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 1st percentile of Glaucoma Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $28 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sayoko Moroi
  • Glaucoma Specialist median
  • Middle half of Glaucoma Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sayoko Moroi were reported at $28. Among 370 Glaucoma Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $597 and the middle half received between $244 and $1,607.

Show as a table
Year Sayoko Moroi Glaucoma Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $433 $150–$1,170 $163
2020 $0 $242 $74–$693 $114
2021 $0 $324 $122–$936 $132
2022 $0 $399 $121–$1,081 $149
2023 $0 $458 $190–$1,208 $160
2024 $0 $558 $215–$1,359 $164
2025 $28 $597 $244–$1,607 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Genentech USA, Inc. $28 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2025
  1. Food and Beverage $28 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

412

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$74,200

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

46.1%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Miebo Perfluorohexyloctane/Pf Brand 29 $21,381
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 19 $11,551
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 23 $8,432
Tyrvaya Varenicline Tartrate Brand 13 $7,782
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 15 $7,329
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 13 $6,198
Travoprost Generic 22 $3,907
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 40 $1,961
Timolol Maleate Generic 45 $1,930
Pilocarpine Hcl Generic 13 $1,178

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$26,622

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

137

Average age 74

Services billed

533

81 women, 56 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 62%
Arthritis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Osteoporosis 24%
Diabetes 22%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Depression 18%
Atrial fibrillation 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

1 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Glaucoma Specialist in Ohio

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record