Medical Doctor Program year 2023 Reported 2019–2023 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Saud Abaalkhail

Rheumatology Minneapolis, MN Medical Doctor

NPI 1982180733 CMS profile 4935707

701 Park Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55415

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,659

79 records reported · program years 2019–2023

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2023

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2023, Saud Abaalkhail of Minneapolis, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,659 across 79 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 51st percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2023 General $805 13
2022 General $991 25
2021 General $380 14
2020 General $149 8
2019 General $335 19

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Saud Abaalkhail
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Saud Abaalkhail were reported at $0. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Saud Abaalkhail Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $335 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $149 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $380 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $991 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $805 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $0 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $0 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $413 7 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $329 7 payments
  3. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $278 6 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $225 12 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $192 5 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $161 4 payments
  7. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $148 2 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $117 2 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $109 5 payments
  10. Horizon Therapeutics plc $102 1 payment
  11. Other $585 28 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Food and Beverage $2,560 78 payments
  2. Education $99 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. RINVOQ $361 5 payments
  2. LUPKYNIS $278 6 payments
  3. BENLYSTA $192 5 payments
  4. TALTZ $158 5 payments
  5. BRILINTA $130 7 payments
  6. KRYSTEXXA $102 1 payment
  7. XARELTO $101 5 payments
  8. KEVZARA $99 1 payment
  9. Enbrel $76 3 payments
  10. SAPHNELO $61 3 payments
  11. Other $770 43 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 8 drugs

Part D claims

147

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$194,547

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

31.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 18 $115,018
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 11 $76,328
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 14 $1,212
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 39 $1,101
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 14 $347
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 17 $342
Prednisone Generic 20 $120
Allopurinol Generic 14 $78

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 16 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$5,261

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

39

Average age 69

Services billed

70

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 56%
Chronic kidney disease 49%
Diabetes 41%
Depression 41%
Osteoporosis 28%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

79 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record