Medical Doctor Program year 2022 Reported 2019–2022 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sarah Petry

Dermatology Duluth, MN Medical Doctor

NPI 1982136321 CMS profile 5690261

400 E 3Rd St, Duluth, MN 55805

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,706

56 records reported · program years 2019–2022

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2022

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2022, Sarah Petry of Duluth, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,706 across 56 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 43rd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2022 General $391 18
2021 General $333 12
2020 General $248 11
2019 General $733 15

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sarah Petry
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sarah Petry were reported at $0. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Sarah Petry Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $733 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $248 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $333 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $391 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $0 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $0 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $0 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $662 22 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $328 8 payments
  3. Celgene Corporation $249 2 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $77 4 payments
  5. LEO Pharma Inc. $73 3 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $69 3 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $52 3 payments
  8. Helsinn Therapeutics (U.S.), Inc. $37 3 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $33 2 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $25 1 payment
  11. Other $101 5 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Food and Beverage $1,706 56 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. HUMIRA $428 15 payments
  2. DUPIXENT $328 8 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $311 12 payments
  4. Otezla $249 2 payments
  5. RINVOQ $184 9 payments
  6. Winlevi $77 4 payments
  7. Absorica LD $77 4 payments
  8. COSENTYX $69 3 payments
  9. ADBRY $52 2 payments
  10. TALTZ $52 3 payments
  11. Other $315 17 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

591

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$466,604

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

12.2%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 17 $342,917
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 28 $95,797
Fluorouracil Generic 90 $6,183
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 61 $3,898
Calcipotriene Generic 11 $3,302
Metronidazole Generic 35 $2,863
Tacrolimus Generic 16 $1,909
Ketoconazole Generic 76 $1,784
Ciclopirox Generic 23 $1,250
Econazole Nitrate Generic 13 $1,243

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 37 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$21,402

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

191

Average age 73

Services billed

748

94 women, 97 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 49%
Diabetes 20%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Depression 14%
Cancer 13%
Osteoporosis 13%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

56 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record